You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Add shared policy contract roadmap with AgentFence #120
agent-kernel and AgentFence both enforce tool-call policy, but at different integration points: agent-kernel in-process inside an agent runtime, and AgentFence as an external MCP/tool-call proxy. Users need to understand whether one policy intent can be authored once and enforced in both places.
Goal
Document and track a shared policy contract roadmap from the agent-kernel side.
Scope
Map agent-kernel policy concepts to AgentFence policy language.
Identify common concepts that should move into weaver-spec.
Identify intentionally different semantics.
Define shared fixtures for allow/deny/ask decisions.
Clarify audit trace compatibility and differences.
Acceptance criteria
agent-kernel docs include a shared-policy roadmap section or page.
The docs link to the corresponding AgentFence roadmap/example.
At least one portable policy intent is demonstrated.
Follow-up implementation/conformance issues are identified.
This issue is one of five near-identical "Add shared policy contract roadmap with AgentFence" issues (#116, #117, #118, #119, #120) opened by the same author within ~3 minutes on 2026-06-07. #120's wording differs only trivially from #116 (same Problem/Goal/Scope/Acceptance intent). Consolidating all tracking onto the earliest one, #116, so the discussion isn't fragmented.
Note: #120 is referenced from several other issues (#131, #135, #138) as the shared-policy-contract tracking issue. Those references should be read as pointing at the surviving canonical issue #116 (and the related implementation issue #111). The closely related implementation issue #111 remains open; a maintainer may want to fold #116 into #111, but that consolidation is left open deliberately rather than assumed here.
Activity
dgenio commentedon Jun 13, 2026
Closing as a duplicate of #116.
This issue is one of five near-identical "Add shared policy contract roadmap with AgentFence" issues (#116, #117, #118, #119, #120) opened by the same author within ~3 minutes on 2026-06-07. #120's wording differs only trivially from #116 (same Problem/Goal/Scope/Acceptance intent). Consolidating all tracking onto the earliest one, #116, so the discussion isn't fragmented.
Note: #120 is referenced from several other issues (#131, #135, #138) as the shared-policy-contract tracking issue. Those references should be read as pointing at the surviving canonical issue #116 (and the related implementation issue #111). The closely related implementation issue #111 remains open; a maintainer may want to fold #116 into #111, but that consolidation is left open deliberately rather than assumed here.
Generated by Claude Code