Repository navigation
Conversation
95A HF and for AMS were listed as two separate choice values, separated only by a comma in the setup instructions, but likely represent a single Bambu TPU-for-AMS variant. Merge them into one choice: 95A HF for AMS.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #102.
The Spoolman
typeextra-field setup instructions listed95A HFandfor AMSas two separate comma-separated choice values. These look like they were meant to be a single choice — Bambu Lab's TPU-for-AMS product is named "TPU for AMS 95A HF" — so this merges them into one value:95A HF for AMS.One-line change, no functional/code impact — just the README instructions.