Skip to content

spec(igla): own_model -- the seven DELIVER cells reviewed, 3 published / 22 verified #10269

Description

@gHashTag

Goal

Record in specs/igla/own_model.t27 that the seven grounded DELIVER cells (7, 8, 16, 17, 18, 25, 27) passed review. PR #10185 grounded them and was meant to carry their review, but auto-merge took it in on 2026-10-18 06:24 with no APPROVE (only a REQUEST_CHANGES on an older head). So the PR for this issue puts the same evidence to review again, with auto-merge off, and its own APPROVE by the reviewer bee is the review it names. Epic #10024.

Boundary

Scenarios

  • Given the change, When t27c test-report specs/igla/own_model.t27 runs on the Railway lab, Then every test passes with 0 vacuous.
  • Given the board spec, When t27c test-report specs/igla/own_model_board.t27 runs, Then every test passes, and the message reads 3 published, 22 verified, 1 drafts, 1 gaps; 61%.
  • Given REVIEWED[24] is set back to false, When the spec is tested, Then a test fails (negative control).

Requirements

  • FR-001: REVIEW_ID MUST name a real APPROVED review on PR REVIEW_PR.
  • FR-002: REVIEWED MUST be true at exactly the seven indices above, and false at index 25.
  • FR-003: The tally MUST be derived by the spec and MUST NOT be typed into it by hand.
  • FR-004: The PR MUST NOT be merged by auto-merge before the APPROVE exists.

Success Criteria

  • On the lab, own_model passes 10 tests of 10 and own_model_board passes 6 tests of 6, 0 vacuous.
  • With REVIEWED[24] set back to false, own_model fails 2 tests (negative control).
  • t27c gen-json specs/igla/own_model_board.t27 prints the message 3 published, 22 verified, 1 drafts, 1 gaps; 61%.

Close criteria

  • The PR merges with an APPROVE on its head lineage and its required checks are green.

Activity

  1. added
    shape-refusedClosed by the issue-shape gate (specs/policy/issue_shape.t27); a passing edit reopens it
    on Oct 18, 2026
  2. github-actions commented on Oct 18, 2026

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    Closed by the issue-shape gate (specs/policy/issue_shape.t27, #7498): an issue must have the template's sections. Edit the body; an edit that passes reopens it.

    • missing: ## Success Criteria -- an outcome a machine can settle: a number with a unit, a backticked file, exit 0, or a backticked command
  3. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Oct 18, 2026
    561c660
    043cdea
  4. gHashTag commented on Oct 18, 2026

    @gHashTag
    OwnerAuthor

    Reopened: #10270 was merged by the issue gate's default auto-merge 90 s after the push, before any review, and #10273 took its claim back. The review is requested again in a PR labelled no-auto-merge.

  5. github-actions commented on Oct 18, 2026

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    Closed by the issue-shape gate (specs/policy/issue_shape.t27, #7498): an issue must have the template's sections. Edit the body; an edit that passes reopens it.

    • missing: ## Success Criteria -- an outcome a machine can settle: a number with a unit, a backticked file, exit 0, or a backticked command
  6. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 18, 2026
    014a34d
  7. gHashTag commented on Oct 18, 2026

    @gHashTag
    OwnerAuthor

    Reopened: #10270 closed this on its unreviewed auto-merge, and #10273 took that change back. The review is now requested in #10275 (label no-auto-merge).

  8. github-actions commented on Oct 18, 2026

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    Closed by the issue-shape gate (specs/policy/issue_shape.t27, #7498): an issue must have the template's sections. Edit the body; an edit that passes reopens it.

    • missing: ## Success Criteria -- an outcome a machine can settle: a number with a unit, a backticked file, exit 0, or a backticked command
  9. removed
    shape-refusedClosed by the issue-shape gate (specs/policy/issue_shape.t27); a passing edit reopens it
    on Oct 18, 2026
  10. github-actions commented on Oct 18, 2026

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    The shape check passes now (specs/policy/issue_shape.t27); reopened.

  11. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Oct 18, 2026
    f4b3c87
    ebbe426
  12. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 18, 2026
    9e9724c
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions