You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
coverage: 3 dangling seals point into an agent worktree path (claude/worktrees/agent-a008408b9580a5586) #6912
The non-required coverage check ("Every seal still describes its spec") fails on unrelated PRs, e.g. run 37477685062 on #6880, with FAIL: 3 seal(s) newly do not hold.
All three are marked [dangling] and resolve to a leaked agent worktree path instead of the repo tree:
Expected: seals reference specs/... relative to the repo root. Fix: re-seal these three specs from a normal checkout (t27c seal --save) and drop the worktree-path seal files; consider a gate that rejects seal paths containing claude/worktrees/.
Already fixed on master by #6862 (75cf4e5): the three seals now carry repo-relative spec_path. tools/check_seal_coverage.py on master: OK, none of the three listed. The failing run 37477685062 predated the fix.
Follow-up idea, not built: a gate rejecting seal paths that start with / or contain claude/worktrees/ (would need to be a .t27 spec under the t27-only rule).
Activity
gHashTag commentedon Oct 6, 2026
Already fixed on master by #6862 (75cf4e5): the three seals now carry repo-relative spec_path.
tools/check_seal_coverage.pyon master: OK, none of the three listed. The failing run 37477685062 predated the fix.Follow-up idea, not built: a gate rejecting seal paths that start with
/or containclaude/worktrees/(would need to be a .t27 spec under the t27-only rule).