Repository navigation
spec-guards: ring-096 drift and 8 published-figure pins were hidden behind the seal step #9043
Description
Re-filed from #6553. An attempt claimed that issue on 2026-10-07 and left an empty branch, and a dispatch row that has spent its retry ceiling keeps its issue for good - so no bee could take it again, however much the brief improved. The work below is carried over unchanged.
Refs #6092
spec-guards has not passed on master since 2026-09-16. The seal-currency step failed first, and that hid the steps after it. #6546 fixes the seal step. On that PR the job now gets one step further and fails on failures that were already on master.
Measured on the Railway t27c lab at master a406f41, with t27c built from master:
tools/check_ring_spec_drift.pyexits 1.ring-096-rustagainstspecs/numeric/formats.t27is DRIFTED: 6 functions are shared and 5 have different signatures.- The spec declares stub signatures such as
fn gf16_to_f32(x: u16) -> gf16 { }andfn quantize_value(x: f32, fmt: Format) -> gf16 { }. - gen-rust lowers these to
u16/f32stubs. - The hand ring
rings/ring-096-rust/src/lib.rsusesf64.
- The spec declares stub signatures such as
tools/published_figures.py --checkexits 1. 8 pinned figures have drifted:[]T{}literals,x.len(),x.len,len(x),a::b::c,OP_*,abs(, and test blocks (pinned 14314, measured 15067).- The pins live in the
FIGURESlist intools/published_figures.py.
check_duplicate_declarations.pyanddiagnostic_capacity.pyexit 0. The CONVERGED-pairs step after them was not run here.
Both repairs touch non-t27 files: either the hand ring, or the Python pin table. The alternative is to change the meaning of formats.t27. Under the 2026-10-05 no-foreign-code rule, this needs an owner decision.
Boundary
specs/numeric/formats.t27rings/ring-096-rust/src/lib.rstools/check_ring_spec_drift.pytools/published_figures.py
User Scenarios
- Given the spec-guards pipeline runs on master after chore(seals): re-seal the 3 stale gen-hash seals that keep spec-guards red #6546 lands, When
tools/check_ring_spec_drift.pyexecutes againstspecs/numeric/formats.t27andrings/ring-096-rust/src/lib.rs, Then it exits 0 because the 5 drifted signatures in ring-096-rust match the spec declarations. - Given the spec-guards pipeline runs on master after chore(seals): re-seal the 3 stale gen-hash seals that keep spec-guards red #6546 lands, When
tools/published_figures.py --checkexecutes, Then it exits 0 because the 8 pinned figure counts in the FIGURES table match the freshly measured values.
Requirements
- FR-001: The hand-written ring
rings/ring-096-rust/src/lib.rsMUST align its 5 drifted function signatures with the stub signatures declared inspecs/numeric/formats.t27(e.g.,gf16_to_f32,quantize_valueusingf64per the ring, or the spec changed tof64). - FR-002: The
FIGURESlist intools/published_figures.pyMUST be updated so that all 8 pinned figure counts (including test blocks: pinned 14314 → measured 15067) match the current measured values from the codebase. - FR-003:
tools/check_ring_spec_drift.pyMUST exit 0 when run againstspecs/numeric/formats.t27andrings/ring-096-rust/src/lib.rsafter the signature alignment. - FR-004:
tools/published_figures.py --checkMUST exit 0 after the FIGURES table is updated to the current measured values.
Success Criteria
python tools/check_ring_spec_spec_drift.py specs/numeric/formats.t27 rings/ring-096-rust/src/lib.rsexits 0python tools/published_figures.py --checkexits 0- The spec-guards job on master passes all steps including CONVERGED-pairs (previously hidden)
The instruments
Every one of these reads and prints; none of them writes. Run them from the repository root, with <spec> replaced by the file in ## Boundary:
.t27 is not Rust and not Zig, and a bee fluent in either writes one by
accident. Measured 2026-09-20: a bee filled eight bodies in
specs/file/watcher.t27 with return Ok(());, Err(FileError::WatcherNotFound)
and for i in 0..watchers.length. The parse ratchet refused the whole file --
Unexpected token in expression: RParen, line 123 -- and a spec that does not
parse generates nothing, so every test it already carried stopped running.
At the top level the parser accepts exactly these eight forms, with an optional
pub, and no others:
const var fn enum struct test invariant bench
There is no trait, no impl, no type X = ..., no generics, no macro. What
a bee reaches for from another language, and what happens:
- Rust's result sugar (
Ok(()),Err(E::V),?) is not a construct here. - Rust macros (
println!,format!,vec!) are not constructs here. - A range loop (
for i in 0..n) is Rust and Zig, not this language. - Zig builtins (
catch unreachable,@intCast,@constCast) are not constructs here. - Cross-module reuse (
use other::fn;) parses and then generates a comment and an unqualified call, so the Zig fails withuse of undeclared identifier(use a::b; generates no import, so no spec can reuse a function from another spec #4298). It does not work yet.
t27c parse <spec> answers in one line whether what you wrote is the language.
Run it before you report, every time.
t27c spec-status <spec>- the compiler's one-word verdict: IMPLEMENTED, PARTIAL, UNWRITTEN, NOPARSE, NOFN. Exit code is 0 whatever it says, so read the word.t27c symbols <spec>- every name the file declares, with its kind. Answers "does this already exist here?" before you add it.t27c outline <spec>- per function: its locals, what it calls, what it returns. The contract you are implementing against.t27c coverage <spec>- which functions have a test and which do not. The issue asks for tests; this is how you check you wrote them.t27c lint <spec>- style and shape warnings. It OVER-REPORTShas no test or invariant: measured 2026-09-20 over 60 specs it printed 677 of those wherecoveragefound 190 untested functions, disagreeing on 59 of the 60 - it warns aboutbit_to_trit_pairinspecs/base/ternary_encoding.t27, whichtest bit_to_trit_pair_zerocalls on line 249. Read it as a hint;coverageis the answer.t27c typecheck <spec>- types, before generation. PrintsTypecheck OK (0 errors, 0 warnings)or the errors.t27c test-report <spec>- builds this spec and runs its own tests, which is what the oracle does.BLOCKEDmeans the generated Zig does not compile, with the error beside it.python3 tools/dupe_scan.py --name <function>- where that function already lives, if it does. 576 of 4021 bodies here are byte-identical copies.
The rest of the toolbelt is in docs/BEE_TOOLBELT.md.
Activity