Repository navigation
docs(conformance): section 4 of FORMATS_ON_BOARD.md points to the two TNF board runs - #904
Conversation
… TNF board runs (#903) Sections 8 and 9 record TNF16 add/mul 1035886/1035886 and MXFP4/TNF4 251616/251616 bit-exact on this AX7203 (2026-09-27); section 4 still listed TNF as never on the board. One paragraph, arithmetic exactness only: no clock and no advantage.
Summary by t27-beesThis PR updates section 4 of Worth a look
Read: 1 files, +8 -0, the whole diff. Head |
X Brain Health CheckScore: 100.0/100 X Brain is above merge threshold |
🧪 Brain Stress Test ResultsScore: not measured (no stress test prints a Score: line) X Stress test passed |
|
The three red checks come from main, not from this one-paragraph change to conformance/FORMATS_ON_BOARD.md:
|
|
Update on the three red checks at the same head
The two that remain are Position unchanged: this does not merge on a red check. It needs main green, or a Dmitrii Fedorov (@dmitrii-f-t27) |
e592f14 to
c2986cf
Compare
|
Status at head
#872 fixes the first two. At its head Position unchanged: no merge on a red check. This merges once main is green (#872, #886) and the checks re-run green on this head. Dmitrii Fedorov (@dmitrii-f-t27) |
Closes #903
Section 4 ("Never on this board") listed TNF without qualification. Sections 8 and 9 of the same file record two TNF board runs on 2026-09-27:
board_runs/tnf16_board_ax7203.log: TNF16 add and mul,TNFFormat(4, 11)v2-spec, 1,035,886/1,035,886 bit-exact, fails 0, lost 0, exit 0.board_runs/mxdot4_board_ax7203.log: MXFP4/TNF4 block dot product, 251,616/251,616 bit-exact.The change adds one paragraph before the TNF and BNF bullet. It says both runs are arithmetic exactness only (no clock was measured, no advantage follows), and that the bullet still holds for BNF, the other three TNF16 definitions and the LUT/Fmax figures it cites. No log, number or other section changes; the added text is ASCII.
Dmitrii Fedorov (@dmitrii-f-t27)