Docs: plugin registry layout and plan (#552) - #568
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟡 Changes recommended
The new docs contain an internal inconsistency around the seed plugin’s display_name (“Hello” vs “Hello (example)”) that could mislead implementers and submitters about the contract.
Get a fresh assessment by requesting another Copilot review.
Pull request overview
Adds a spec addendum and a detailed implementation plan for “piece B” of the plugin directory work (#552): the curated registry repo (goblogplatform/plugins) and the seed example plugin repo (goblogplatform/goblog-plugin-hello), including CI validation and GitHub Pages publishing shape.
Changes:
- Documented the concrete file/layout decisions for the registry + seed plugin repos in the plugin directory design spec.
- Added a step-by-step implementation plan (commands, code skeletons, tests, workflows, Pages go-live checklist) for building and publishing the registry output (
index.json+ per-plugin JSON).
File summaries
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| docs/superpowers/specs/2026-09-14-plugin-directory-design.md | Adds “Piece B” concrete repository layouts and key decisions (registry structure, validation/publish behavior). |
| docs/superpowers/plans/2026-09-15-plugin-directory-registry.md | New end-to-end implementation plan for the registry and seed plugin repo, including CLI, tests, workflows, and go-live steps. |
Review details
- Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
- Comments generated: 2
- Review effort level: Lite
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
…ame() (#552) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Spec addendum and implementation plan for piece B of #552 — the registry and seed plugin repos:
🤖 Generated with Claude Code