Skip to content

Add DESIGN:OS 3D Blender - #588

Open
jangtrinh wants to merge 1 commit into
hashgraph-online:mainfrom
jangtrinh:add-design-os-3d-blender
Open

jangtrinh wants to merge 1 commit into
hashgraph-online:mainfrom
jangtrinh:add-design-os-3d-blender

Conversation

@jangtrinh

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Adds DESIGN:OS 3D Blender to Tools & Integrations.

  • Free; nothing is sold. Source-available under PolyForm Shield 1.0.0.
  • Contains .codex-plugin/plugin.json, SECURITY.md, LICENSE, README.md.
  • Local scan: plugin-scanner==3.57.0 scan . → Final Score: 88/100 (B - Good), findings critical:0, high:0, medium:6, low:2.

README-only change; no bundle files copied.

@qodo-free-for-open-source-projects

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Grey Divider

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review

Grey Divider

Tip of the day
💡 Did you know, you can describe a rule in plain language on the Rules page and Qodo drafts it for you

More tips ↗ | Customize Qodo ↗ | Qodo docs ↗

Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

@qodo-free-for-open-source-projects

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary by Qodo

List DESIGN:OS 3D Blender under Tools & Integrations

📝 Documentation 🕐 Less than 5 minutes

Grey Divider

AI Description

• Add DESIGN:OS 3D Blender to the community Tools & Integrations list.
• Describe its free, source-available Blender modeling skills and MCP server.
High-Level Assessment

A README entry matches the existing community integration listings. Copying the external plugin into this repository would add maintenance without serving this listing.

Files changed (1) +1 / -0

Documentation (1) +1 / -0
README.mdAdd DESIGN:OS 3D Blender to community integrations +1/-0

Add DESIGN:OS 3D Blender to community integrations

• Adds a link under Tools & Integrations describing the external project's Codex skills, MCP server, Blender use case, and source-available license. No plugin files are added to this repository.

README.md

@kantorcodes kantorcodes left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nonapproving technical preflight at PR head 0258d4fd311e5c3b843a92d510cfdff27d427a95: I checked jangtrinh/design-os-3d-blender's current .codex-plugin/plugin.json against this catalog's scripts/validate-plugin-pr.py. The upstream interface currently has logo: "./docs/images/cover.png" but no required composerIcon. The validator explicitly requires interface.composerIcon, pointing to an existing SVG or PNG no larger than 51,200 bytes. I also checked the current docs/images/cover.png; it is substantially larger than that limit, so reusing it unchanged as composerIcon will not clear bundle validation. Please add an appropriately sized source-owned SVG/PNG and set interface.composerIcon to its valid plugin-root-relative path, then link the updated upstream commit for one fresh catalog validation run. The PolyForm Shield source license is accurately identified as source-available in the README-only listing; nothing needs copying into HOL. The reported local 88/100 scan is useful context but does not replace catalog-owned security and bundle checks. This is not independent security approval, merge authorization, a live Blender test or publication confirmation.

@zerocodefast zerocodefast left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am requesting changes because the upstream .codex-plugin/plugin.json still lacks interface.composerIcon, which required bundle validation needs to point to an existing supported SVG/PNG no larger than 51,200 bytes. Please add the source-owned asset, set a valid plugin-root-relative path, and link the updated source commit for revalidation; the 88/100 scanner score is clear but does not waive this bundle blocker.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants