SRE-927: Migrate same-repo action references to the $/ syntax by TimDiekmann · Pull Request #9197 · hashintel/hash

TimDiekmann · 2026-08-11T10:18:51Z

Purpose

Migrates same-repo action references to the $/ self-repository syntax and wires up the centralized actionlint preflight (hashintel/.github#100–#102), which lints all workflow files on every PR.

What does this change?

uses: ./.github/actions/… → $/.github/actions/… in 7 workflows and 2 composite actions (nested references)
Fixes the actionlint/shellcheck findings the new check surfaces: quoted $GITHUB_OUTPUT/$GITHUB_ENV/$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY redirects, backticks in echoed help text replaced with double quotes, $(…) instead of legacy backticks in canary-release.yml, grouped summary redirects in lint.yml, a dead TEST_TASKS assignment removed in test.yml, and two unicode apostrophes replaced
warm-up-vercel.yml: cron */3 → */5 — GitHub schedules at a 5-minute minimum, so the previous value was never honored
The pull_request preflights are consolidated into one preflight.yml: Todo comments plus the new Lint job calling the centralized preflight-actionlint.yml (check name: Preflight / Lint / Actions). The pull_request_target file (Dependencies, Labeler, PR title) moves to preflight-target.yml; check names stay unchanged.

Known issues

bench.yml base-leg semantics change with $/: the base-bench steps previously resolved composite actions from the base checkout; $/ always resolves them at the running commit, so both legs now use the PR's action versions. This matches the behavior the other repos converged on and removes a base/head skew, but base runs with changed actions are no longer byte-identical to their original runs.
release.yml keeps its two ./ references for now — SRE-904: Split token minting from the release run #9192 restructures that file and both changes would conflict. Migrate after SRE-904: Split token minting from the release run #9192 merges.

How to test this?

Every job on this PR resolves its composite actions via $/
The Preflight / Lint / Actions check lints this repo's workflows with only the three syntax-gap ignores ($/, concurrency.queue; SRE-941)

… findings

vercel · 2026-08-11T10:18:57Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview	Aug 11, 2026 11:46am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview	Aug 11, 2026 11:46am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Aug 11, 2026 11:46am

codecov · 2026-08-11T10:23:45Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.63%. Comparing base (f06f964) to head (bd85fb3).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9197      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.63%   59.63%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1420     1420              
  Lines      138767   138767              
  Branches     6555     6555              
==========================================
- Hits        82754    82753       -1     
- Misses      54949    54950       +1     
  Partials     1064     1064

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.99% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`14.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.49% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`3.27% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`10.02% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`12.22% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`2.36% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.81% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.21% <ø> (-0.02%)`	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`7.36% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.59% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-embeddings	`91.88% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`29.33% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`46.78% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`84.71% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`89.63% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`28.39% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`78.98% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.51% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`79.82% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.09% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`87.92% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.04% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-08-11T10:27:01Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 98 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing t/sre-927-migrate-same-repository-action-and-workflow-references-to (bd85fb3) with main (1e4cb8e)}

cursor · 2026-08-11T11:23:20Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Touches many CI workflows and changes bench base-leg action resolution; deploy/release behavior is mostly reference-path and lint fixes, with release.yml still on ./.

Overview
Composite actions across CI workflows (and nested calls in install-tools / docker-build-push) now use $/.github/actions/… instead of ./.github/actions/…, so actions resolve from the workflow commit. release.yml is unchanged on purpose pending another PR.

Preflight is split: preflight-target.yml handles pull_request_target (dependencies, labeler, PR title); preflight.yml on pull_request / merge group runs todo-comments plus a new Lint job that calls centralized preflight-actionlint.yml. The standalone todo-comments workflow file is removed.

Lint/shell hygiene from the new check: quoted $GITHUB_OUTPUT, $GITHUB_ENV, and $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY; safer subshells in canary-release.yml; SARIF piping and grouped step-summary writes in lint.yml; removal of a dead assignment in test.yml; echoed help text uses double quotes instead of backticks.

warm-up-vercel.yml: schedule */3 → */5 (GitHub’s minimum interval), drops redundant checkout, and uses $/…/warm-up-vercel.

Note: In bench.yml, base and head legs both use the PR’s composite action versions via $/ (no longer base-checkout-relative ./).

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit bd85fb3. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

Copilot

Pull request overview

Migrates same-repository GitHub Action references to $/ syntax and centralizes PR preflight workflows.

Changes:

Migrates local composite-action references to $/.
Consolidates preflight checks and adds centralized actionlint.
Resolves shellcheck findings and corrects the Vercel warm-up schedule.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 12 out of 12 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
`.github/workflows/warm-up-vercel.yml`	Migrates the action reference and fixes the cron interval.
`.github/workflows/test.yml`	Migrates action references and addresses shellcheck findings.
`.github/workflows/preflight.yml`	Consolidates pull-request preflight jobs and adds actionlint.
`.github/workflows/preflight-todo-comments.yml`	Removes the superseded standalone workflow.
`.github/workflows/preflight-target.yml`	Hosts privileged target-event preflight jobs.
`.github/workflows/lint.yml`	Migrates actions and resolves linted shell patterns.
`.github/workflows/deploy.yml`	Migrates deployment action references and quotes output redirects.
`.github/workflows/codspeed.yml`	Migrates benchmark action references and quotes output redirects.
`.github/workflows/canary-release.yml`	Migrates actions and modernizes command substitution.
`.github/workflows/bench.yml`	Migrates benchmark actions and quotes workflow-file redirects.
`.github/actions/install-tools/action.yml`	Migrates nested composite-action references.
`.github/actions/docker-build-push/action.yml`	Migrates the nested ECR login action reference.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

cursor

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 94065d9. Configure here.}

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 12 out of 12 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

thehabbos007

The big one 🪨

github-actions · 2026-08-11T12:51:22Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.391 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.024 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$12.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.128 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 412 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.130 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 145 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.812 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$23.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 234 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 208 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.706 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.519 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 119 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.965 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.379 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.106 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.462 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.042 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.364 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.631 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.061 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.805 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.563 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.97 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.678 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.270 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.068 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.758 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.766 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.509 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.381 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.535 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.005 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.282 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.264 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.517 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.182 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.575 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$42.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.317 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$33.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.656 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$35.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.766 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$31.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 209 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.341 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$41.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$50.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 336 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.590 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$40.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.343 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$92.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 450 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$33.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$278 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.17 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.536 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.454 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.309 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.591 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.205 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.136 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.310 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.406 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 104 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.809 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.550 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$11.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.393 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.484 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.202 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.748 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.356 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$11.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.134 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.025 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.280 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 49.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.219 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$56.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 467 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 593 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.224 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$63.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 546 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.402 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$73.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 555 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.418 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$81.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 594 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.745 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$87.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 522 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.259 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$42.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.419 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$70.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 423 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.886 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$49.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 405 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.083 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$58.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 480 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.067 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 507 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.306 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 448 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.325 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 522 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 537 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.902 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$19.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 255 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.589 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$521 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.14 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.594 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

TimDiekmann added 2 commits August 11, 2026 12:17

SRE-927: Migrate same-repo action references to $/ and fix actionlint…

235355b

… findings

SRE-927: Call the centralized actionlint preflight workflow

3cb7165

TimDiekmann self-assigned this Aug 11, 2026

github-actions Bot added the area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) label Aug 11, 2026

TimDiekmann deployed to pull-request August 11, 2026 10:19 — with GitHub Actions Active

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens August 11, 2026 10:20 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut August 11, 2026 10:21 View deployment

SRE-927: Drop useless-cat pipelines in the lint workflow

c1e13a8

TimDiekmann deployed to pull-request August 11, 2026 10:27 — with GitHub Actions Active

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens August 11, 2026 10:28 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut August 11, 2026 10:30 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash August 11, 2026 10:43 View deployment

SRE-927: Consolidate the pull_request preflights into one file

fc290bb

TimDiekmann deployed to pull-request August 11, 2026 10:47 — with GitHub Actions Active

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens August 11, 2026 10:48 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut August 11, 2026 10:51 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash August 11, 2026 11:04 View deployment

SRE-927: Drop the default token permissions in the target preflight

94065d9

TimDiekmann deployed to pull-request August 11, 2026 11:09 — with GitHub Actions Active

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens August 11, 2026 11:11 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut August 11, 2026 11:13 View deployment

TimDiekmann requested a review from a team August 11, 2026 11:22

TimDiekmann marked this pull request as ready for review August 11, 2026 11:23

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings August 11, 2026 11:23

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash August 11, 2026 11:23 View deployment

TimDiekmann enabled auto-merge August 11, 2026 11:23

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of TimDiekmann August 11, 2026 11:23 View session

Copilot AI reviewed Aug 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

cursor Bot reviewed Aug 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread .github/workflows/warm-up-vercel.yml

SRE-927: Drop the checkout the warm-up action no longer needs

bd85fb3

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 11, 2026 11:32

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of TimDiekmann August 11, 2026 11:33 View session

TimDiekmann deployed to pull-request August 11, 2026 11:33 — with GitHub Actions Active

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens August 11, 2026 11:34 View deployment

Copilot AI reviewed Aug 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut August 11, 2026 11:36 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash August 11, 2026 11:46 View deployment

thehabbos007 approved these changes Aug 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

TimDiekmann added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 11, 2026

Merged via the queue into main with commit 5253e33 Aug 11, 2026
192 checks passed

TimDiekmann deleted the t/sre-927-migrate-same-repository-action-and-workflow-references-to branch August 11, 2026 12:14

Uh oh!

Conversation

TimDiekmann commented Aug 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Purpose

Related links

What does this change?

Known issues

How to test this?

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Aug 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Aug 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Aug 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Aug 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

cursor Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

thehabbos007 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

TimDiekmann commented Aug 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

vercel Bot commented Aug 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Aug 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq Bot commented Aug 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented Aug 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading