Skip to content

BE-756: Set up hash-graph-authentication crate - #9209

Merged
TimDiekmann merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
t/be-756-set-up-graph-authentication-crate
Aug 12, 2026
Merged

BE-756: Set up hash-graph-authentication crate#9209
TimDiekmann merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
t/be-756-set-up-graph-authentication-crate

Conversation

@TimDiekmann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Sets up the crate, no further changes.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

3 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
hash Ignored Ignored Preview Aug 12, 2026 3:46pm
hashdotdesign-tokens Ignored Ignored Preview Aug 12, 2026 3:46pm
petrinaut Skipped Skipped Aug 12, 2026 3:46pm

@github-actions github-actions Bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team type/legal Owned by the @legal team labels Aug 12, 2026
@TimDiekmann
TimDiekmann deployed to pull-request August 12, 2026 15:21 — with GitHub Actions Active
@TimDiekmann
TimDiekmann deployed to pull-request August 12, 2026 15:21 — with GitHub Actions Active
Comment thread libs/@local/graph/authentication/Cargo.toml Outdated
@github-advanced-security

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

You are seeing this message because GitHub Code Scanning has recently been set up for this repository, or this pull request contains the workflow file for the Code Scanning tool.

What Enabling Code Scanning Means:

  • The 'Security' tab will display more code scanning analysis results (e.g., for the default branch).
  • Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results.
  • You will be able to see the analysis results for the pull request's branch on this overview once the scans have completed and the checks have passed.

For more information about GitHub Code Scanning, check out the documentation.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.63%. Comparing base (38ab9fd) to head (a9d7b51).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9209   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.63%   59.63%           
=======================================
  Files        1420     1421    +1     
  Lines      138767   138770    +3     
  Branches     6555     6555           
=======================================
+ Hits        82753    82755    +2     
- Misses      54950    54951    +1     
  Partials     1064     1064           
Flag Coverage Δ
rust.hash-graph-authentication 100.00% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 15.38%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 96 untouched benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[64] 140.8 ns 170 ns -17.16%
bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[200] 185.8 ns 215 ns -13.57%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing t/be-756-set-up-graph-authentication-crate (a9d7b51) with main (38ab9fd)1

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (7d02529) during the generation of this report, so 38ab9fd was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

@vercel
vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut August 12, 2026 15:46 Inactive
@TimDiekmann
TimDiekmann marked this pull request as ready for review August 12, 2026 15:46
@TimDiekmann
TimDiekmann requested a review from a team as a code owner August 12, 2026 15:46
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings August 12, 2026 15:46
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary

Cursor Bugbot is generating a summary for commit a9d7b51. Configure here.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Sets up the hash-graph-authentication Rust crate for future Graph credential validation.

Changes:

  • Adds the crate scaffold, metadata, documentation, and tooling.
  • Registers the crate in Cargo and Yarn workspaces.
  • Updates generated lockfiles and dependency documentation.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 9 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
Cargo.toml Registers the new workspace crate and dependency.
Cargo.lock Records the new Rust package.
yarn.lock Records the new workspace package.
libs/@local/graph/authentication/Cargo.toml Defines crate metadata and dependencies.
libs/@local/graph/authentication/src/lib.rs Adds the library entry point and scaffold test.
libs/@local/graph/authentication/package.json Adds monorepo scripts and package metadata.
libs/@local/graph/authentication/README.md Describes the crate’s intended role.
libs/@local/graph/authentication/LICENSE.md Adds the AGPL license.
libs/@local/graph/authentication/docs/dependency-diagram.mmd Adds the initial dependency diagram.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@TimDiekmann
TimDiekmann enabled auto-merge August 12, 2026 15:49
@TimDiekmann
TimDiekmann added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 12, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 648e991 Aug 12, 2026
196 checks passed
@TimDiekmann
TimDiekmann deleted the t/be-756-set-up-graph-authentication-crate branch August 12, 2026 16:25
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$25.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.935 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.050 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002 $$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.376 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$42.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 382 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.908 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$14.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 96.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.394 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527 $$23.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.883 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$26.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.033 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$13.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.027 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.058 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.485 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52 $$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.423 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$5.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.339 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.891 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108 $$4.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$4.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.683 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$4.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.257 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.429 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.080 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2 $$2.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.976 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.946 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.824 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.465 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.395 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.148 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.677 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.249 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27 $$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.885 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.174 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.182 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$42.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.640 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$33.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 152 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.614 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$35.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 142 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.643 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$42.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.21 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}32.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$41.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.100 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$49.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.086 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$39.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$89.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 464 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.463 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$43.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.62 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}30.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$303 \mathrm{ms} \pm 980 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.032 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.074 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.576 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.401 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.034 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.992 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 43.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.001 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.510 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.240 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.609 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.240 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.740 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.697 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.356 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.874 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.045 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 48.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.213 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 46.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.269 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.674 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$8.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 48.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.381 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$55.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.390 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 540 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.048 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$63.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 412 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.994 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$73.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 409 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.922 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$82.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 426 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.096 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$88.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 515 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.896 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$42.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 241 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.097 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$70.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 373 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.496 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$48.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 209 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.345 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$57.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 321 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.179 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$60.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 375 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.253 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$60.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 458 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.233 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$126 \mathrm{ms} \pm 614 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$136 \mathrm{ms} \pm 419 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$558 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.06 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}2.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team type/legal Owned by the @legal team

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants