Repository navigation
Fix descriptions: distinguish implemented ALDEx2 from planned ANCOM-B… - #7
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…C; add catalogue agda CICD gate; create closable issue file Co-authored-by: arena-agent <297053741+arena-agent@users.noreply.github.com>
Contributor
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. Note Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait... ⚙️ Run configuration
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
hyperpolymath
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2026
## What Deletes `.github/workflows/agda-cicd.yml` and strikes through the `.github/ISSUE.md` checklist line that recorded it, with the reason. ## Why The workflow (added in #7) did `uses: hyperpolymath/standards/.github/workflows/echidna-verify.yml@main`. That callee declares **no `workflow_call` trigger** (`grep -c workflow_call` = 0; it runs on push / pull_request / schedule / workflow_dispatch only) and is standards' own `lol/proofs` + avow corpus gate. GitHub refuses such a call at plan time, so every run was a startup death: `conclusion: failure` with **zero jobs** (run 37231048694 on `main`, also red on arena 01c5afd). It never passed on any head. The catalogue row's "Reusable?" column reads `Yes`; that is recorded as a standards finding in dev-notes, not fixed here. None of the 16 standards workflows that do declare `workflow_call` is an Agda gate, so there is nothing to retarget to. ## What still gates the proofs The `proofs` job in `.github/workflows/ci.yml`: `proofs/check.sh` under Debian 13's `agda-bin=2.6.4.3-1+b2` and `agda-stdlib=2.1-4` in a digest-pinned image. Axiom audit, type-check of `CompositionalDA.All`, three reject controls, gate self-test. Green at aa8f6e6. No proof source changes in this PR. `main` carries no rulesets (`rules/branches/main` = `[]`), so this red blocked nothing; it only misreported the proof corpus as failing. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) https://claude.ai/code/session_01AjVQUkziVYywrLNsbPordh Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…C; add catalogue agda CICD gate; create closable issue file
Summary
Closes #
Type of change
How has this been verified?
Checklist
git commit -S).SPDX-License-Identifier(code/configMPL-2.0,prose
CC-BY-SA-4.0); I did not relicense existing files.Notes for reviewers