Skip to content

ci(antipattern): allowlist legit TS bridge/adapter paths - #37

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/antipattern-allowlist-bridges
May 3, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/antipattern-allowlist-bridges

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Same fleet-wide patch as stapeln#24 / rsr-template-repo#30. Broadens TS exclusion list (bindings/, tests/, test/, scripts/, mcp-adapter/, vscode/).

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit c756444 into main May 3, 2026
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the ci/antipattern-allowlist-bridges branch May 3, 2026 15:34
Repository owner deleted a comment from chatgpt-codex-connector Bot May 13, 2026
hyperpolymath added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2026
Adds `open-pull-requests-limit` to Dependabot update blocks that had no
cap, following the estate per-ecosystem cap doctrine (task #37). No
other line in the file is touched.


Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011eQ7hibx92N7fBDtwgReWk

<!--
SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0
Copyright (c) Jonathan D.A. Jewell <j.d.a.jewell@open.ac.uk>
-->
## Summary

<!-- What does this PR do, and why? -->

Closes #

## Type of change

- [ ] 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
- [ ] ✨ New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (would change existing behaviour)
- [ ] 🕳️ Soundness fix (fixes a checker/proof false-negative)
- [ ] 📖 Documentation
- [ ] 🧹 Refactor / tech debt (behaviour-preserving)
- [ ] ⚡ Performance
- [ ] 🔧 Build / CI / tooling

## How has this been verified?

<!-- Establish ground truth: which tool did you RUN, and what did it
report?
     Don't cite a status doc — cite the command and its output. -->

## Checklist

- [ ] My commits are **signed** (`git commit -S`).
- [ ] I ran the project's own checks/tests locally and they pass.
- [ ] New files carry the correct `SPDX-License-Identifier` (code/config
`MPL-2.0`,
      prose `CC-BY-SA-4.0`); I did not relicense existing files.
- [ ] Docs are updated, and no public claim now overstates what the code
does.
- [ ] I have not introduced a soundness hole (or I have flagged where I
might have).

## Notes for reviewers

<!-- Anything that needs special attention, follow-up, or context. -->

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant