Skip to content

docs(proposals): record the last four owner rulings - #50

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
marina/eager-dijkstra-wlmapg
Nov 10, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
marina/eager-dijkstra-wlmapg

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

This pull request follows pull request 49, which merged at commit 430889d. Two later commits did not reach main. They record the last four rulings that the owner gave through the selector on 2026-11-10. Without them, main says that four decisions are open, and work order 1.4 states the arm that the owner did not choose.

It changes two proposal documents only. It changes no gate, schema, deed clause or data file.

Changes

  • docs/proposals/mathesis-re-anchoring.adoc:
    • D-5 ruled (a): amend ADR 0004 to the canon reader and ratify it. Work order 2.2 gains the steps for ADR 0004, the receipts proposal and issue 28.
    • D-8 ruled (a): the proof toolchains come from the Guix manifest. The plan had recommended release archives first. Work order 1.4 now follows the ruling and has a stop condition.
    • The status line and the decisions section say that each of the eight decisions is ruled.
  • docs/proposals/mathesis-research-programme.adoc:
    • R-3 ruled (a): statement S-2 lives in Mathesis.
    • R-4 ruled: januskey is the first slice from theorem to code. Experiment E-3.1 and the order of work name it.
    • R-5 stays open.

RSR Quality Checklist

Required

  • Tests pass (just test or equivalent). Not run to completion: the session had no Idris2 and no Zig. This pull request changes documents only.
  • Code is formatted. Not applicable: no code changed.
  • Linter is clean. Not applicable: no code changed.
  • No banned language patterns
  • No unsafe blocks without // SAFETY: comments
  • No banned functions
  • SPDX license headers present on all new/modified source files
  • No secrets, credentials, or .env files included

As Applicable

  • Documentation updated for user-facing changes
  • docs/status/ROADMAP.adoc updated. Not changed on purpose: the plan gives the change as work order 3.4.
  • CHANGELOG or release notes updated. Not changed.

Testing

Run locally on the rebased branch, with Just 1.56.0 and asciidoctor 2.0.26:

  • bash scripts/check-adoc-renders.sh .: PASS, all 183 tracked .adoc files render clean.
  • asciidoctor -v --failure-level INFO on both files: no warning, no broken cross reference.
  • just validate-repo-map: up to date.
  • bash scripts/check-root-shape.sh .: PASS.
  • bash scripts/check-invisible-characters.sh: no finding.

The branch was restarted from main after the merge of pull request 49, with the owner's approval of the force push. The two commits have the same patch identifiers as before the rebase.

Screenshots

Not applicable.


Generated by Claude Code

The owner ruled through the selector on 2026-11-10:

- D-5: amend ADR 0004 to the canon reader and ratify it; mark the
  receipts proposal settled in part; close issue 28 with a pointer.
- D-8: proof toolchains come from the Guix manifest. The plan had
  recommended release archives first. Work order 1.4 now follows the
  ruling and has a stop condition.
- R-3: statement S-2 lives in Mathesis.
- R-4: januskey is the first slice from theorem to code.

Each decision of the plan is now ruled. R-5 of the programme is open.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.2 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0136P7ZnDRsCLfZcFcEzvPcM
The plan said that the companion programme records two rulings. It
records four: the token order (provisional on X-PF1), the kernel
import, the home of S-2 and the first slice.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.2 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0136P7ZnDRsCLfZcFcEzvPcM
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Explain Change →

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2026 17:05
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ❌ Failed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ❌ Failed 2026-11-10T17:05:59.350057Z
We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex review to try again.
5f7f5fc Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit 3bc0055 into main Nov 10, 2026
43 of 44 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants