Skip to content

feat(proofs): write the machine receipt of THY-1 (WO 1.5) - #58

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
marina/eager-dijkstra-wlmapg
Nov 10, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
marina/eager-dijkstra-wlmapg

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Work order 1.5 of docs/proposals/mathesis-re-anchoring.adoc. Mathesis now has the PROOF-POLICY §8.5.1 machine receipt for its one theory theorem, THY-1.

Changes

  • verification/receipts/theory_praxis.deed, written from the THY-1 record. The canon reader (standards be39f90, deed_lint.js --proof-receipt-json) derives PWG-2ii, the grade in PROOF-STATUS.adoc. It refuses the same receipt when it records PWG-1. Each receipt says it is a local run, because no CI lane has given one yet; that is why the grade is not PWG-1.
  • Trusted base: agda --dependency-graph puts Agda.Primitive in the cone of FeatureReachability. It postulates exactly Level, lzero, lsuc and _⊔_, each bound by BUILTIN. The THY-1 record said the cone was the module alone; it now names Agda.Primitive (§8.4).
  • CI validates every verification/receipts/*_praxis.deed with the canon reader. The canon pin of the other checks (8e48b1c) predates the reader, so this step has its own pinned, sparse checkout.

Not done here: the claim hyperpolymath/mathesis#THY-1 in the registry. The registry's own parser reads only the older quoted receipt shape, so it would show THY-1 as ungraded. WO 2.2 moves the registry to the canon reader, and the claim lands with it.

RSR Quality Checklist

Required

  • No banned language added
  • SPDX header on the new file

Testing

  • The canon reader reads the receipt and derives PWG-2ii; a tampered PWG-1 copy fails with exit 1.
  • .github/hooks/validate-deed.sh with the pinned canon: passes.
  • just validate-repo-map: up to date.

Generated by Claude Code

verification/receipts/theory_praxis.deed is the PROOF-POLICY 8.5.1 receipt
of THY-1, written from its record in PROOF-STATUS.adoc. The canon reader
(standards be39f90, deed_lint.js --proof-receipt-json) derives PWG-2ii from
it, the grade PROOF-STATUS records, and refuses the same receipt when it
claims PWG-1. Each receipt says it is a local run, because no CI lane has
given one yet; that is why the grade is not PWG-1.

- The trusted base is the Agda.Primitive block: agda --dependency-graph
  puts Agda.Primitive in the cone of FeatureReachability (checked
  2026-11-10), and it postulates exactly Level, lzero, lsuc and _⊔_, each
  bound by BUILTIN. The THY-1 record said the cone was the module alone;
  it now names Agda.Primitive (PROOF-POLICY 8.4).
- CI validates every verification/receipts/*_praxis.deed with the canon
  reader. The canon pin of the other checks (8e48b1c) predates the reader,
  so this step has its own pinned, sparse checkout.

Not done here: the claim hyperpolymath/mathesis#THY-1 in the registry. The
registry's own parser reads only the older quoted receipt shape, so it would
show THY-1 as ungraded. WO 2.2 moves the registry to the canon reader; the
claim lands with it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0136P7ZnDRsCLfZcFcEzvPcM
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2026 18:36
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit c527480 into main Nov 10, 2026
46 checks passed
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants