Skip to content

chore(census): refresh the row of system-et (the wager proofs are on its main branch) - #60

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/system-et-row-after-wager
Nov 10, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/system-et-row-after-wager

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

The row of hyperpolymath/system-et was out of date. The wager proofs merged into the main branch of system-et (pull request 89, 2026-11-10 17:16 UTC) after the row was taken this morning (#48). This pull request takes the row again.

This is the 1 open pull request that changes census rows. docs/status/ROADMAP.adoc records it under "Open census work", as the rule "One writer for census data" says. The other open pull request (#59) changes no row.

Changes

Field Before After
proof files 86 102
provers agda 65, lean 21 agda 80, lean 22
declarations 612 773
holes, axioms, unsafe flags, policy files 0 0
  • docs/catalogue/census/catalogue-rows.json and docs/catalogue/catalogue.adoc: written by scripts/census/update-rows.sh hyperpolymath/system-et. This is the script of just update-rows. just is not installed in the session, so I ran the script directly, with the same argument.
  • docs/atlas/generated/ (4 files): written by bun scripts/atlas/census-atlas.mjs build, from the same rows.
  • docs/status/ROADMAP.adoc: the record under "Open census work".

No row was edited by hand. Only the row of system-et changes: 1 line in each of the 6 generated files.

What the numbers count. The scanner counts project files also. Of the 102 files, 79 are .agda files and 20 are .lean files. The other 3 are the .agda-lib file, lakefile.toml and lean-toolchain. The scan read system-et at bbe1d13, and its list of .agda and .lean files is equal to the list on that commit (99 files).

RSR Quality Checklist

Required

  • Tests pass: the census and atlas checks below. just test was not run (no just in the session).
  • No banned language patterns
  • No secrets, credentials, or .env files included
  • Not applicable: formatter, linter, unsafe blocks, banned functions, SPDX headers. No source file changes.

As Applicable

  • docs/status/ROADMAP.adoc updated

Testing

Run locally at b704582:

  • bash scripts/census/render-catalogue.sh docs/catalogue/census | diff -u docs/catalogue/catalogue.adoc - (the catalogue-check recipe): no difference, exit 0.
  • bun scripts/atlas/census-atlas.mjs check: PASS: generated atlas matches census.
  • bun test tests/atlas/census-atlas.test.mjs: 10 pass, 0 fail.
  • bash tests/census/build_rows_status_test.sh: pass.
  • bash scripts/check-ijson-jcs.sh --enforce: 17 files checked, 17 canonical.

Not verified:

  • The scanner counts declarations with its own rules. I did not count the 773 declarations by another method.
  • The other 248 rows. They are not changed, and they were not taken again.

Generated by Claude Code

…its main branch)

The wager proofs merged into the main branch of system-et (pull request
89) after the row was taken this morning. The row said 86 proof files and
612 declarations. The main branch now has more.

`scripts/census/update-rows.sh hyperpolymath/system-et` (the script of
`just update-rows`) took the row again:

- proof files: 86 to 102 (agda 65 to 80, lean 21 to 22)
- declarations: 612 to 773
- holes, axioms, unsafe flags, policy files: 0, as before

The count of the scanner includes project files. Of the 102 files, 79 are
`.agda` and 20 are `.lean`; the other 3 are the `.agda-lib` file,
`lakefile.toml` and `lean-toolchain`.

`bun scripts/atlas/census-atlas.mjs build` made the atlas views again
from the same rows. Only the row of system-et changes, 1 line in each of
the 6 generated files.

`docs/status/ROADMAP.adoc` records this change under "Open census work",
as the rule for census data says.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0136P7ZmiFSCoB3UR9Kk56rK
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2026 19:32
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ❌ Failed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ❌ Failed 2026-11-10T19:32:23.827623Z
We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex review to try again.
b704582 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit a516be1 into main Nov 10, 2026
44 checks passed
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

Repository owner deleted a comment from coderabbitai Bot Nov 10, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Explain Change →

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants