Skip to content

[Copilot Planning] Meshspaces human onboarding, switching, and management completeness review #52

Description

@kwalus

Context: The Meshspaces UI spec needs to be fully implementable for real human operators, not just aesthetically coherent. This issue is planning-only.

Goal: Pressure-test the UI/UX plan from a human perspective and identify missing flows, controls, and failure states.

Focus areas:

  • first-run mesh creation wizard
  • invite import routing and review UX
  • switching cleanly between meshspaces
  • active mesh framing inside child runtimes
  • runtime management, trust, storage, backup, reset, archive, and diagnostics controls
  • mobile behavior and shared-screen privacy considerations
  • whether a non-developer operator could actually manage this safely

Expected deliverable:

  • Open a PR from a Copilot branch with a findings report in docs/meshspaces-review/human-ux-and-management.md
  • Optional spec clarifications in docs are welcome. No feature implementation.

Ground rules:

  • Do not redesign Canopy broadly.
  • Focus on missing flows, confusion points, and operator safety.
  • Distinguish what belongs in shell UI vs child runtime UI.

No activity

Activity on this issue will appear here.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions