Skip to content

test(migration): characterize source stop and lease drain - #6676

Merged
huangruiteng merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/planned-agent-transfer-20261017
Oct 16, 2026
Merged

huangruiteng merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/planned-agent-transfer-20261017

Conversation

@loopx-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Preparing a planned Agent transfer must distinguish stopping automatic advancement from excluding old execution and settling its leases. A stopped Goal still permits an already admitted Agent to write back; withdrawn membership makes a retained lease ineffective without releasing it, so restoring membership can make it effective again.

Add a real CLI regression on canonical File and SQLite that composes ordinary bootstrap, peer configuration, an independent Git worktree, Goal stop, warm/cold mutation rejection, exact cleanup after withdrawal, and membership recovery without reviving a released proof. The bilingual reference explains those existing boundaries and their relationship to the planned-transfer proposal.

This is preparatory characterization for the transfer composition. Production behavior is unchanged; portable packaging, destination admission, continuation of the unfinished task, and the initiating frontend journey remain unimplemented. It does not ask users to assemble a migration from these commands.

Validation:

  • 151 related source tests passed; the final added cases were rerun after adding the membership-restoration control.
  • The final cases passed outside the checkout against a normally installed wheel. Five affected owner files match the current baseline byte for byte. Removing native registration rejection in that disposable installation made both provider cases fail; restoring the exact file made both pass again. This is affected-owner installed evidence, not full newest-main package qualification.
  • Ruff, configured mypy, semantic-vocabulary drift, public-boundary scan, and diff hygiene passed. Exact-scope premerge passed 4 direct and 12 selected checks with no warnings or manual holds; CQR is valid.
  • Frontend/Lark, PostgreSQL and a complete source-to-destination migration were not exercised or changed. Existing migration and long-running qualification gates remain open.

The related refactor pass retained the existing typed owners and one local test trace; no new production wrapper, schema or parallel decision source is needed for this batch.

Signed-off-by: LoopX Agent <337587101+loopx-agent@users.noreply.github.com>

@loopx-agent loopx-agent left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer: model_agent; gpt-6.1-sol; OpenAI; runtime_reported; effort=max

Approval conclusion (author-owned PR; GitHub blocks formal self-approval). Exact head 6ee8f37353f7865534c2e477891e30f24b59e38e.

动机

负责把正在工作的 Agent 迁往另一环境的实现者,需要判断源端何时才能安全交接。以前缺少真实入口的组合回归,容易把 Goal 已停止或租约 active=false 当作源端已排空;现在 File/SQLite 回归直接证明这些状态不同,并拦住放宽成员资格检查的反例。维护者获得可重复执行的源端交接边界验证,避免迁移编排依赖错误假设;现有运行时行为保持不变。本 PR 不提供迁移命令、可携包、目标执行准入或目标 Agent 继续任务。完整计划内迁移及发起入口的继续任务、独立验收和失败恢复仍未实现。

改动思路

同一条真实 CLI 旅程复用既有 Goal activation、peer 配置、canonical Todo 和类型化租约 owner。测试先证明合法源端回写仍可完成,再验证撤回后的热/冷拒绝和精确释放后的恢复;不把诊断字段变成新的执行权威。以下表格是该 head 的已验证边界摘要,不替代执行证据。

操作 原租约记录 执行边界
停止自动推进 保留 已获准回写仍有效
撤回成员资格 仍可为 active 当前成员资格不允许执行;恢复资格可能重新有效
精确释放租约 released 重新注册也不复活原证明

具体改动

关键内容讲解

test_stop_withdrawal_and_exact_release_have_distinct_authority 用普通 bootstrap、独立 Git worktree 和真实 File/SQLite。它同时覆盖 stop 零写预览、原租约保留、合法 note 回写、撤回后热/冷拒绝、拒绝不改 provider revision、未释放时恢复资格、撤回后精确 cleanup,以及释放后旧证明拒绝。configuration-backup.md 新增匹配的中英文解释,并明确进程停止、外部 effect 结果和目标准入尚需各自 owner 完成。

规格依据为 docs/architecture/rfcs/complete-state-recovery-v0.md,不可变基线 f184f13b29011fd33753cb1f49c96d1af9730c09。quiescent、M2、M3 均为 deferred:本批只刻画源端边界,没有证明完整跨 owner 静止/捕获、目标采用或继续任务。该文档中计划内迁移仍是提案,未被提升为已实现接口。现有 request、原 receipt、格式和默认策略没有改动。

对主干的风险

没有 production diff;主要风险是把通过的回归误称为迁移交付。151 项关联源码验证通过,最终新增案例补充成员恢复对照后再跑通过。正常安装包在源码目录外运行同一最终案例;五个受影响 owner 与当前基线逐字节一致,不能据此推断最新 main 整包资格。在仅有测试数据的安装副本移除原生成员检查,两 provider 均在撤回边界失败;精确恢复文件后均再次通过。

配置 mypy、Ruff、semantic drift 和公开边界扫描通过。准确范围 premerge 为4项 direct与12项所选检查,零告警/manual hold,CQR有效。先前 CQR输入超长、测试目录不受 advisory支持和临时report不存在属于验证编排错误,已修正并保留原始结果,没有放松产品阈值。按包内 wait_for_ci=false 未查询或等待远端CI。未验证 frontend/Lark/Host、PostgreSQL、外部 effect 或完整跨环境迁移;这些仍是父旅程缺口,不由本批测试核销。

我的整体评价

本 head 无阻塞发现,结论 APPROVE,交付判断为 justified_increment。long_horizon 与 user_experience 都是 preserved:现行运行时和用户步骤没有变化,得到的是可重复执行且能抓住真实权威退化的组合回归。扫描已有 activation/lease/default 和 TS eligibility/inspection 覆盖及同作者近期批次后,未发现等价组合用例或重复测试系列;本批有独立的源码 consumer 和反例价值。

166行增量局限于一个参数化测试和双语深层参考;相关重构检查保留现成 typed owner,不加包装器或推测框架。下一工作仍是同一完整计划内迁移,从源准备贯通目标准入、继续原未完成任务及发起入口独立验收,不应继续拆成 owner 字段或小测试系列。本条 COMMENTED 自评不等于独立 GitHub approval,不授予 merge 权限。

English verdict: APPROVE — exact head 6ee8f37353f7865534c2e477891e30f24b59e38e. Real CLI/File/SQLite characterization distinguishes stop, withdrawn membership and exact lease release; the disposable installed native-owner mutant fails both cases and exact restoration passes. Whole Agent transfer remains unimplemented; no merge authority is claimed.

@huangruiteng
huangruiteng merged commit cabd89b into main Oct 16, 2026
26 of 33 checks passed
@huangruiteng
huangruiteng deleted the codex/planned-agent-transfer-20261017 branch October 16, 2026 19:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants