add allgather mnnvl test to ci pipeline

[RJ Souza (Empyreus)]

No description provided.

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines:
There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

[Binyang Li (Binyang2014)]

LGTM, this algo works for both in-place and out-of-place right? Did you try to use switchChannel semaphore for the synchronization

[RJ Souza (Empyreus)]

LGTM, this algo works for both in-place and out-of-place right? Did you try to use switchChannel semaphore for the synchronization

I haven't tried with those options. I can add some tests if we would like.

[RJ Souza (Empyreus)]

/azp

[azure-pipelines]

Supported commands

• help:
• Get descriptions, examples and documentation about supported commands
• Example: help "command_name"
• list:
• List all pipelines for this repository using a comment.
• Example: "list"
• run:
• Run all pipelines or specific pipelines for this repository using a comment. Use this command by itself to trigger all related pipelines, or specify specific pipelines to run.
• Example: "run" or "run pipeline_name, pipeline_name, pipeline_name"
• where:
• Report back the Azure DevOps orgs that are related to this repository and org
• Example: "where"

See additional documentation.

[RJ Souza (Empyreus)]

/azp run

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 6 pipeline(s).
1 pipeline(s) were filtered out due to trigger conditions.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 68.45%. Comparing base (1f5f065) to head (bf83343).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #877   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   68.45%   68.45%           
=======================================
  Files          61       61           
  Lines        5932     5932           
=======================================
  Hits         4061     4061           
  Misses       1871     1871           

Flag	Coverage Δ
cuda-80	63.03% <ø> (ø)
cuda-90	68.35% <ø> (ø)
rocm-gfx942	63.21% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.