Skip to content

Prepare v1.2.0: voice calibration and claim-preserving edits - #1

Merged
milock merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/humanizer-v1.2.0
Sep 15, 2026
Merged

milock merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/humanizer-v1.2.0

Conversation

@milock

@milock milock commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Problem and result

Humanizer already has basic voice calibration, but its generic rules can override approved voice choices and its worked examples introduce facts absent from the input. This prepares v1.2.0 with evidence-based calibration and claim-preserving editing, adapted from Michael Lock's September deslop work.

  • Select the publisher's voice source, capture six observations, and compare the result against them. Explicit preferences override generic rules; calibration stays transient unless saving is requested.
  • Preserve facts, uncertainty, negation, rankings, and asks. Flag missing evidence and hollow drafts without inventing examples or metrics.
  • Keep existing output headers, remove unsupported detector-performance claims from active guidance, and replace contradictory examples.
  • Include voice templates and documentation in installations; repeated installs do not nest resource folders.

Validation

Skill validator, shell syntax, whitespace checks, local Markdown links, and fresh/repeat installation checks passed. Independent review checked contracts and contradictions. A forward exercise preserved voice preferences, uncertainty, a date, a number, a request, a technical term, and code. Two qualitative baseline/current simulations found clearer instructions and no observed regressions; these are not controlled model benchmarks.

Release state

Draft preparation only. CHANGELOG marks 1.2.0 Unreleased; no tag or release has been published. See docs/release-1.2.0.md for validation limits and publication steps.

@milock
milock marked this pull request as ready for review September 15, 2026 17:19
@milock
milock merged commit ec66c20 into main Sep 15, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant