Skip to content

Adding Streaming HTTP Transport #79

Closed
3 of 3 issues completed
Closed

Description

@SeanChinJunKai

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It is part of specification upgrades https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-03-26/basic/transports#streamable-http

Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to add the new transport

Hi @e5l and @devcrocod , could I go ahead with implementing this?

Activity

  1. e5l commented on Apr 17, 2025

    @e5l
    Contributor

    yep

  2. SeanChinJunKai commented on Apr 22, 2025

    @SeanChinJunKai
    ContributorAuthor

    I am still working on it

  3. SoldierSacha commented on May 6, 2025

    @SoldierSacha

    Out of curiosity, any ETA for this?

  4. e5l commented on May 7, 2025

    @e5l
    Contributor

    @SeanChinJunKai, let me know if you need help

  5. self-assigned this
    on May 7, 2025
  6. ChrisBugliosi commented on May 20, 2025

    @ChrisBugliosi

    @e5l @SeanChinJunKai @devcrocod any updates on the project or has it gone stale? Should someone else take this on if nobody is working on it?

  7. SeanChinJunKai commented on May 24, 2025

    @SeanChinJunKai
    ContributorAuthor

    I was facing some issues with implementation but feel free to pick it up

  8. devcrocod commented on Jul 21, 2025

    @devcrocod
    Contributor

    The streamable client was added and released in version 0.6.0.
    Unfortunately, there are issues with the streamable server #87

  9. mantisMolloy commented on Oct 5, 2025

    @mantisMolloy

    Just checking, is this issue still active?

    I left some comments on #235 which would help with integration testing for the non-streaming response.

    I see other comments relating to incompatibility with ktor for the streaming approach. Has an issue been raised on the ktor project to address this?

  10. assigned and unassigned on Oct 22, 2025
  11. FunkyMuse commented on Dec 22, 2025

    @FunkyMuse

    Just checking, is this issue still active or being worked on?

  12. kpavlov commented on Dec 23, 2025

    @kpavlov
    Contributor

    Indeed, the server-side functionality is partially implemented, but further development is required before declaring it production-ready. We are also currently facing infrastructure challenges that are hindering our progress.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions