Skip to content

Main README and docs do not mention funannotate2 #1187

Closed

Description

@peterjc

I just discovered https://github.com/nextgenusfs/funannotate2 via a comment on the issue tracker.

Please link to it with a brief explanation of the relative status of v1 and v2 - my impression from https://funannotate2.readthedocs.io/en/latest/changelog.html is that funannotate2 not yet production ready, but is expected to replace v1 at some point?

Activity

  1. nextgenusfs commented on Jul 31, 2026

    @nextgenusfs
    Owner

    Funannotate2 is fully functional. Was completely rewritten for dependency reduction. I’ve switched over awhile ago. They aren’t the same.

  2. peterjc commented on Jul 31, 2026

    @peterjc
    ContributorAuthor

    Ah, looking at https://github.com/nextgenusfs/funannotate2/releases I see now that https://funannotate2.readthedocs.io/en/latest/changelog.html is totally out of date.

    [Update: I logged https://github.com/nextgenusfs/funannotate2/issues/80 for that].

    Still, my point stands. The v1 main documentation could and perhaps at this point should suggest looking at v2.

  3. nextgenusfs commented on Aug 1, 2026

    @nextgenusfs
    Owner

    Sure. Valid point. I just don’t have a lot of time. This stuff all outside of day job.

  4. peterjc commented on Aug 3, 2026

    @peterjc
    ContributorAuthor

    See also @hyphaltip's reply on nextgenusfs/funannotate2#80 (comment)

    Yes f2 is a streamlined new tool. It’s open source free time dev effort.

    I've opened nextgenusfs/funannotate2#81 to clarify the f2 changelog page (which wrongly gave me the impression f2 was still pre-release).

    Should I suggest an edit to the f1 docs that f2 be used now in preference?

  5. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 12, 2026
  6. hyphaltip commented on Oct 12, 2026

    @hyphaltip
    Collaborator

    addressed

  7. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 12, 2026
  8. rzelle-lallemand commented on Oct 29, 2026

    @rzelle-lallemand

    @hyphaltip, I was surprised to see a new release for funannotate 1.x (https://github.com/nextgenusfs/funannotate/releases/tag/v1.9.0). Do you still encourage users to migrate to 2.x? It sounds like you're planning maintain both versions for the foreseeable future?

  9. hyphaltip commented on Oct 29, 2026

    @hyphaltip
    Collaborator

    I'm maintaining 1.x and have fixed some bugs and things with EVM and PASA that are folded into those dependencies now that are customized fixes of those packages + some rust reimplementation speedups. Fun1 is part of my lab's workflows so I plan to maintain it for a while and have been working on getting singularity and docker images that are clean and efficient lately on a couple of OSes.

    @nextgenusfs is developing 2.x - there are different predictors and consensus model calling

    I have not done any direct performance and accuracy testing between the two though have been testing a lot in comparison of 1.7.x and 1.9.x and working on some streamlining I am doing in 1.10

    So you'll have to decide what your preferences are for these. I've depended on the training strategies we employ in 1.x so I'm sticking with it for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions