Skip to content

docs: record CSRG-U6 as the active unit - #33

Merged
novelKR merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/project-thread-af6ntg
Oct 12, 2026
Merged

novelKR merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/project-thread-af6ntg

Conversation

@novelKR

@novelKR novelKR commented Oct 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Records CodeSpace's CSRG-U6 as the active unit in DevGuard's ledger. It is bookkeeping, the same kind of change as #28 and #30, and is not part of U6's definition of done.

Why

The owner directed CSRG-U6 to start on 2026-10-12. Its predecessor is on CodeSpace main: CSRG-U5 merged as novelKR/CodeSpace#92 (0c21a7f), recorded here by #31, and governed PTY executions have been observed before the reap since novelKR/CodeSpace#93 and novelKR/CodeSpace#95 (181a020), recorded by #32. CodeSpace main is now 7024f74 and still links this repository at 6e7e065; its post-merge CI is green: CI run 38233097644 and documentation run 38233098609. The ledger still records U6 as not-started.

Changes

File Change
milestones.json CSRG-U6 is active, the value #28 and #30 gave U4 and U5 when they started. units.as_of is 2026-10-12. CS-RG stays in-progress, qualification not-run
docs/milestones.md The CS-RG row and the dated note under the suspension notice say U6 is the active unit
AGENTS.md The dated current-state note says U6 is active
docs/planning/README.md, docs/ko/planning/README.md The dated current-state note says U6 is active
docs/planning/milestones/CS-RG.md, docs/ko/planning/milestones/CS-RG.md The dated current-state note says U6 is the active unit; its sentence on PTY observation is unchanged

Korean counterparts reviewed; planning-readme and planning-milestones-cs-rg hashes recorded with scripts/check_docs.py record.

What does not change

  • CS-RG is not marked implemented or qualified. U6 is not recorded as merged and its qualification is not claimed: both wait for U6's evidence and the owner's exact-head approval.
  • The suspension of the CSRG-C00–C09 plan stays in force, and no historical text is rewritten: each change is the existing dated note or the living status row.
  • No product code, contract, design revision, pin, dependency, CI policy or test changes. The DG-1 qualified release stays 0.1.0-5daee5d-b3fa569e. As the owner chose on 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-12, a new release built from 6e7e065 is to replace it on the qualification host before U6's qualification; that release is not SLO-qualified until it is measured and promoted, and recording it is a separate change.

Verification

At 8fca59c, based on main at 152a2cf:

  • python3 scripts/ci_plan.py --base origin/main --head HEAD: profile affected, 8 normative paths, stages whitespace, source-contract and documentation, no Rust.
  • python3 scripts/validate.py --stages whitespace,source-contract,documentation --diff-base origin/main: all three passed.
  • python3 scripts/check_docs.py: passed, 18 reviewed pairs, 48 work units, 25 logical PR groups.
  • python3 -m unittest discover -s scripts -p 'test_ci_*.py': 95 tests passed.

Rollback

Revert the merge (git revert -m 1 <merge commit>). The ledger then reports U6 as not-started again, which would be inaccurate while U6 is under way.

The owner directed CSRG-U6 to start on 2026-10-12, after CSRG-U5 merged
in CodeSpace as novelKR/CodeSpace#92 (0c21a7f), recorded here by #31,
and governed PTY executions came to be observed before the reap through
novelKR/CodeSpace#93 and novelKR/CodeSpace#95, recorded by #32. Record
U6 as active with the units dated 2026-10-12, and say so in AGENTS.md,
the milestone table and note, the planning index and the CS-RG plan,
English and Korean. CS-RG stays in-progress with qualification not-run,
DG-1's qualified release is unchanged, and the suspension of the
CSRG-C00-C09 plan is unchanged. Korean counterparts reviewed;
planning-readme and planning-milestones-cs-rg hashes recorded.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants