Repository navigation
Conversation
… configuration changes in the same request or job https://community.openproject.org/wp/JIM-261
klappradla
approved these changes
Oct 26, 2026
klappradla
left a comment
klappradla
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wow, quite a find 🦅
The fix makes sense 👍
…om_fields_spec.rb Co-authored-by: Max Mulatz <max@bitcrowd.net>
as-op
deleted the
bug/jim-261-custom-field-values-are-silently-dropped-when-a-type-s-form-configuration-changes-in-the-same-request-or-job
branch
October 26, 2026 12:30
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ticket
https://community.openproject.org/wp/JIM-261
What are you trying to accomplish?
Fixing a bug with custom field caching
What approach did you choose and why?
Clearing the cache if a custom field is added to a type's form configuration
Merge checklist