[klaustopher]

Ticket

https://community.openproject.org/projects/AUTOWORK/work_packages/AUTOWORK-303/activity

What are you trying to accomplish?

• Admin UI to manage custom field values per project

AI involvement

Collaborative – AI generated a substantial part of the code; I reviewed and understand every line.

Merge checklist

• Added/updated tests
• Added/updated documentation in Lookbook (patterns, previews, etc)
• Tested major browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Edge, ...)

[oliverguenther]

Product feedback:

Would be nice to have a quick filter here for "any values customized". Not sure if you talked about this already.

[oliverguenther]

2026-10-26_12-33-11.mp4

In the admin UI: Searching for values and then paginating removes the filter text

[oliverguenther]

Found only the pagination issue and some smaller N+1 issues. Did a smoke test of the main paths for both hierarchy and list fields. The implementation appears to be working fine 👏

The feature is marked as premium, but no enterprise guards exist yet as far as I can tell

[klaustopher]

In the admin UI: Searching for values and then paginating removes the filter text

I switched to a proper ProjectQuery with a custom filter. This survives pagination.

[github-actions]

Warning

Flaky specs

• rspec ./spec/features/work_packages/table/delete_work_packages_with_descendants_spec.rb[1:2:1]

🤖 Ask Copilot to investigate

Copy the prompt below into a new comment on this PR to delegate the investigation to GitHub Copilot. It will look into the flakiness and open a separate pull request with you as reviewer.

@copilot The following spec(s) are flaky in CI (first seen on PR #26277, linked for reference only):

- `rspec ./spec/features/work_packages/table/delete_work_packages_with_descendants_spec.rb[1:2:1]`

Treat this as a standalone task, unrelated to PR #26277. Create a new branch from origin/dev and open a new pull request targeting dev — do not stack it on PR #26277 or reuse that branch.

Follow the playbook in docs/development/testing/handling-flaky-tests/README.md to find the root cause and fix the underlying race — do not skip, delete, or weaken the spec to make it pass; disabling is a last resort per the playbook, and only with a bug ticket. Verify the fix by running the spec(s) repeatedly (e.g. `script/bulk_run_rspec --run-count 10`).

If you cannot reproduce the flake or are not confident in a fix after reasonable investigation, do not fabricate a change or skip the spec to force CI green. Instead, leave the pull request in draft and document what you tried, the suspected cause, and any leads in its description, then assign @klaustopher to take over.

Once the fix is verified, title the PR after the spec(s) it fixes, and use the PR description to explain the root cause, how the change resolves it, and the before/after results. Label the PR `flaky-spec`, assign @klaustopher, and request a review from @klaustopher.
On every commit, set @klaustopher as the sole co-author with a `Co-authored-by:` trailer (use their GitHub no-reply email so it links to their account), so it is traceable who dispatched the fix.