Repository navigation
Add local tokenwar scan - #17
Merged
Merged
Conversation
ousamabenyounes
force-pushed
the
feat/tokenwar-scan
branch
from
August 31, 2026 06:56
441d68b to
f41513c
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
tokenwar scan, a local-only log scanner that estimates which TokenWar tools would have helped mostponytailandpxpipeincluded)Test verification (RED -> GREEN)
RED on
origin/mainwith the new dispatcher test applied:GREEN on this branch, targeted scope plus the fixed check fixture:
Additional validation:
Note: a full local Docker
bats tests/run innode:20-bookwormstill fails intests/statusline.bats, but the prior GitHub Actions run on this PR passed those statusline cases. The branch CI is the source of truth for that environment.