DOI validation as suggested in #398 - #409
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #409 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 52.36% 52.48% +0.12%
==========================================
Files 37 37
Lines 6065 6085 +20
Branches 648 649 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 3176 3194 +18
- Misses 2241 2242 +1
- Partials 648 649 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
stschiff
reviewed
Sep 28, 2026
stschiff
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great to have this. I'm not following everything, see comments, but I also trust you, and my confusion relates only to the golden tests... so good to merge as I'm sure you know what you're doing.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When merged this should solve #398.
With these changes validating the community-archive yields this output: