chore: upgrade Rocq 9.0 → 9.1#30
Draft
avrabe wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
Conversation
- Bump default Rocq version from 9.0 to 9.1 - Use version-specific coqPackages sets (coqPackages_9_1) so coqutil, hammer, and smpl resolve against the correct Rocq version - smpl stays on rocq-9.0 branch (declares rocq-core >= 9.0) - nixpkgs has all required packages: rocq-core 9.1.1, hammer 1.3.2+9.1, coqutil 0.0.7 (supports 9.0-9.2) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The smpl nix expression was hardcoded to coq_9_0, causing .vo version mismatch (90001 vs 90100) when using Rocq 9.1. Now parameterized via rocq_nix_attr attribute passed from the extension. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
3 tasks
avrabe
marked this pull request as draft
April 3, 2026 01:15
1 task
avrabe
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2026
…for #37 (#40) rules_rocq_rust had no rivet project. Initializes one (stpa + dev schemas) and seeds the top of the V so #37 (add Flocq/Gappa/Coq-Interval for machine-checked FP error-bound proofs) can be driven through the feature loop with traceability from commit one: - STPA: the loss is a false "verified" signal from this toolchain propagating into a downstream safety case (e.g. relay's flight-math kernels). H-001 generalizes an already-fixed failure class (the smpl .vo version mismatch in PR #30, the rocq_library -Q path issue in #35). H-002 is the new risk #37 introduces: trusting a Gappa-emitted proof certificate without replaying it through the Rocq kernel. - REQ-001/DD-002 document the existing mechanism (Bazel action-failure semantics + explicit Rocq-version pinning) that already satisfies the general constraint. - REQ-002/DD-001/FEAT-001 capture #37's own technical assessment (Gappa for rounding, Coq-Interval for approximation, Flocq underneath, every Gappa certificate kernel-replayed) as the accepted design. rivet validate passes; remaining warnings are expected (no test artifacts yet — this is the scaffold, not the implementation). Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011MptgyfLZuHYCbfpq1zDey Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
rocq-core >= 9.0)Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code