Skip to content

Update/add veeru - #957

Closed
crhea93 wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
update/add-veeru
Closed

crhea93 wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
update/add-veeru

Conversation

@crhea93

@crhea93 crhea93 commented Sep 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I added Veeru (dosvk) to both the contributors and editorial_board yml files.

@netlify

netlify Bot commented Sep 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Deploy Preview for pyos-website ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 8a656a8
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/pyos-website/deploys/6ab6c4265aec0600086b03ed
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-957--pyos-website.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
🤖 Make changes Run an agent on this branch

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@InessaPawson InessaPawson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@crhea93 Please add Veeru (@dosvk) to https://github.com/orgs/pyOpenSci/teams/editorial-board first.
Since editorial-board.yml is regenerated by update-editorial-board, let’s make sure this entry won't disappear on the next scheduled update. Otherwise, the PR looks good.

@crhea93

crhea93 commented Sep 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Ahhh ok is that the correct order of operations for all future ones?

@InessaPawson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@crhea93 I must admit, I've never onboarded an editor myself. Perusing the onboarding guide, it looks like adding a new editor to the GitHub team should come before submitting a PR to pyopensci.github.io.
cc @lwasser

Comment thread data/contributors.yml
packages_reviewed:
location:
email:
- name: Veerendra Kumar Sunkavalli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@crhea93 before we merge this let's test out my other workflow.

i am not sure what will happen if Verrendra hasn't been added as a contributor yet. but you can use all-contributors to add them as a contributor. also cc'ing @shaunagm on this we will test this workflow out. it might break and that is ok if it breaks we should add this person using the all-contributors bot to the software-submission repository first in our workflow.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok I'm trying the all-contributors first :D

@lwasser

lwasser commented Sep 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

ok please see this pr - #960 it turns out that my action didn't have correct permissions and because of that it couldn't add a new contributors but the code was all there ✨ so i had thought about that use case!! i suspect we can close this if 960 looks good and then i will show you all have to manually run this if you need to update people!

Finally if this doesn't register on the website that is another issue that we can open and easily fix!!

@crhea93

crhea93 commented Sep 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Ok! And just to be clear, with the new method you put together these PRs will be obsolete?

@lwasser

lwasser commented Sep 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ok! And just to be clear, with the new method you put together these PRs will be obsolete?

YES! if the new workflows look ok to you - and i think they do what you want them to do, instead of submitting pr's you can just trigger the action to run whenever you want and it will also run once a week automagically . we can then close this pr in favor of #960 which is an automated workflow that just had a missing token permission and i just fixed it!

@lwasser

lwasser commented Sep 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

ok so let's close this in favor of #960

@lwasser lwasser closed this Sep 28, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants