Skip to content

rutt_mon universally quantifies R1 R2 under the sim relation - #2

Open
rudynicolop wants to merge 4 commits into
rogerburtonpatel:new-coinductionfrom
rudynicolop:rudy/pr/285
Open

rudynicolop wants to merge 4 commits into
rogerburtonpatel:new-coinductionfrom
rudynicolop:rudy/pr/285

Conversation

@rudynicolop

@rudynicolop rudynicolop commented Jul 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@rogerburtonpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

If this builds, great! If the change to the signature of ruttF breaks things down the line, I recommend using Arguments to fix it as in Eqit.v, line 166 and around. You may have to play with context variables to get it working nicely.

@rudynicolop
rudynicolop marked this pull request as ready for review July 14, 2026 11:39
@rudynicolop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

If this builds, great! If the change to the signature of ruttF breaks things down the line, I recommend using Arguments to fix it as in Eqit.v, line 166 and around. You may have to play with context variables to get it working nicely.

I have the argument order of rutt match ruttF, rutt_, and rutt_mon, by the recommendation of @YaZko. I have separate Proper instances, but the proofs are not replicated.

Here I preserve the original Section in Rutt.v.

@rudynicolop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

If this builds, great!

I believe that this builds 😅 (I only checked on my local setup)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants