Link to proposed LLM policy in CONTRIBUTING and pull request template by jyn514 · Pull Request #155424 · rust-lang/rust

jyn514 · 2026-04-17T09:27:23Z

Blocked until rust-lang/rust-forge#1040 merges.

As described in rust-lang/blog.rust-lang.org#1897, this adds a checkbox for authors to confirm that they have/have not used an LLM. For that reason I would like to merge it before the blog post.

rustbot · 2026-07-30T07:12:33Z

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

Fallback group: @Mark-Simulacrum, @jieyouxu
@Mark-Simulacrum, @jieyouxu expanded to Mark-Simulacrum, jieyouxu

rustbot · 2026-07-30T07:12:34Z

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

This PR is based on an upstream commit that is older than 28 days.

It's recommended to update your branch according to the rustc-dev-guide.

jyn514 · 2026-07-30T07:16:51Z

(git trouble, sorry)

Mark-Simulacrum

Generally speaking r=me, one question though:

@bors delegate+

View changes since this review

Mark-Simulacrum · 2026-08-01T13:42:37Z

 tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this.
+-->

+<!-- homu-ignore:start -->


Hm, do we not want to ignore the full template text in homu's snapshot of the PR description? Or is the LLM comment already ignored?

oh, i might be confused what this comment actually does. i thought it meant "don't interpret r? jyn514 as a triagebot comment", if it actually means "don't add this to the merge commit description" then it should include the whole block, yeah.

i've changed this to exclude the new comment as well as the checkboxes themselves. as i note in rust-lang/rust-forge#1040 (comment) i'm worried about harassment if we put the LLM disclosure in the repo's permanent git history.

The homu comments definitely relate to bors / merge descriptions (relevant code: https://github.com/rust-lang/bors/blob/39e5b13af92f7ce73e19283bd27167524233fd8e/src/bors/mod.rs#L327). Any HTML block will get ignored by triagebot though: https://github.com/rust-lang/triagebot/blob/fe9bfc1a9dc492736f5414f611413f7af4b1a628/parser/src/ignore_block.rs#L51-L53 (I guess that includes comments - https://docs.rs/pulldown-cmark/latest/pulldown_cmark/enum.Tag.html#variant.HtmlBlock).

rust-bors · 2026-08-01T13:43:50Z

✌️ @jyn514, you can now approve this pull request!

If @Mark-Simulacrum told you to "r=me" after making some further change, then please make that change and post @bors r=Mark-Simulacrum.

View changes since this delegation.

rustbot · 2026-08-01T14:22:03Z

rustfmt is developed in its own repository. If possible, consider making this change to rust-lang/rustfmt instead.

cc @rust-lang/rustfmt

jyn514 · 2026-08-05T05:13:48Z

@rustbot label -S-blocked

jyn514 · 2026-08-05T05:14:06Z

@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum rollup=always

rust-bors · 2026-08-05T05:14:09Z

📌 Commit 833ec34 has been approved by MarkSimulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

⚠️ The following reviewer(s) could not be found: MarkSimulacrum

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 10. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

Reason for tree closure: manually handling queue due to backlog

jyn514 · 2026-08-05T05:32:40Z

@bors r- r=Mark-Simulacrum rollup=always

rust-bors · 2026-08-05T05:32:45Z

This pull request was unapproved.

View changes since this unapproval

jyn514 · 2026-08-05T05:35:29Z

@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum rollup=always

rust-bors · 2026-08-05T05:35:32Z

📌 Commit 833ec34 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 10. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

Reason for tree closure: manually handling queue due to backlog

[blocked] Link to proposed LLM policy in CONTRIBUTING and pull request template **Blocked** until rust-lang/rust-forge#1040 merges. As described in rust-lang/blog.rust-lang.org#1897, this adds a checkbox for authors to confirm that they have/have not used an LLM. For that reason I would like to merge it *before* the blog post.

…uwer Rollup of 22 pull requests Successful merges: - #158147 (std: fix stack buffer overflow in Windows junction_point) - #159784 (Hint that memchr returns an in-bounds index) - #160130 (Select cache values to verify by key fingerprint, not value fingerprint) - #160343 (Rename `OutlivesPredicate` to `OutlivesClause`) - #160360 (Remove rustc_middle dependency on rustc_hir_pretty) - #160387 (rustc_codegen_ssa: Correctly apply the static `--jobs-backend` limit to backend parallelism) - #160422 (move mir-opt miri tests to CI logic) - #160444 (Avoid resolving path keywords outside `TypeNS`) - #160510 (Resolver: (un)tracked borrows for `CmRefCell` made safe my unsafe speculative flag) - #155424 ([blocked] Link to proposed LLM policy in CONTRIBUTING and pull request template) - #158726 (std: move futex implementations into sys::sync::futex) - #159225 (Split IncrCompSession out of Session) - #159820 (Make the `rustc_unsafe_specialization_marker` attribute actually `unsafe`) - #160198 (Rework `smallest_range_containing` to handle duplicates) - #160362 (Split `SpannedTypeVisitor` into its own crate, `rustc_ty_walk`) - #160390 (autodiff: Handle slice-tailed DSTs in type trees) - #160420 (Suggest `cast_signed()` for overflowing signed integer literals) - #160520 (Add some tests for specialization) - #160522 (fix(bootstrap): Normalize the names of proc macro dependency crates) - #160531 (docs: fix typo in AllowExprMetavar comment) - #160538 (Update expect messages in tcp.rs doc examples to follow the style guide) - #160548 (bootstrap: Register `coverage-map` and `coverage-run` aliases via a separate step)

[blocked] Link to proposed LLM policy in CONTRIBUTING and pull request template **Blocked** until rust-lang/rust-forge#1040 merges. As described in rust-lang/blog.rust-lang.org#1897, this adds a checkbox for authors to confirm that they have/have not used an LLM. For that reason I would like to merge it *before* the blog post.

…uwer Rollup of 25 pull requests Successful merges: - #154585 (treat no_mangle_generic_items as hard error instead of lint warning) - #158147 (std: fix stack buffer overflow in Windows junction_point) - #160130 (Select cache values to verify by key fingerprint, not value fingerprint) - #160343 (Rename `OutlivesPredicate` to `OutlivesClause`) - #160360 (Remove rustc_middle dependency on rustc_hir_pretty) - #160387 (rustc_codegen_ssa: Correctly apply the static `--jobs-backend` limit to backend parallelism) - #160422 (move mir-opt miri tests to CI logic) - #160444 (Avoid resolving path keywords outside `TypeNS`) - #160510 (Resolver: (un)tracked borrows for `CmRefCell` made safe my unsafe speculative flag) - #155424 ([blocked] Link to proposed LLM policy in CONTRIBUTING and pull request template) - #158726 (std: move futex implementations into sys::sync::futex) - #158762 (Emit thumb code on VEX V5) - #159225 (Split IncrCompSession out of Session) - #159820 (Make the `rustc_unsafe_specialization_marker` attribute actually `unsafe`) - #160198 (Rework `smallest_range_containing` to handle duplicates) - #160362 (Split `SpannedTypeVisitor` into its own crate, `rustc_ty_walk`) - #160390 (autodiff: Handle slice-tailed DSTs in type trees) - #160420 (Suggest `cast_signed()` for overflowing signed integer literals) - #160516 (Add regression test for HRTB projection in closure) - #160520 (Add some tests for specialization) - #160522 (fix(bootstrap): Normalize the names of proc macro dependency crates) - #160523 (Add regression test for opaque type) - #160531 (docs: fix typo in AllowExprMetavar comment) - #160538 (Update expect messages in tcp.rs doc examples to follow the style guide) - #160548 (bootstrap: Register `coverage-map` and `coverage-run` aliases via a separate step)

…uwer Rollup of 25 pull requests Successful merges: - #158147 (std: fix stack buffer overflow in Windows junction_point) - #160130 (Select cache values to verify by key fingerprint, not value fingerprint) - #160343 (Rename `OutlivesPredicate` to `OutlivesClause`) - #160360 (Remove rustc_middle dependency on rustc_hir_pretty) - #160387 (rustc_codegen_ssa: Correctly apply the static `--jobs-backend` limit to backend parallelism) - #160422 (move mir-opt miri tests to CI logic) - #160444 (Avoid resolving path keywords outside `TypeNS`) - #160510 (Resolver: (un)tracked borrows for `CmRefCell` made safe by unsafe speculative flag) - #155424 ([blocked] Link to proposed LLM policy in CONTRIBUTING and pull request template) - #158726 (std: move futex implementations into sys::sync::futex) - #158762 (Emit thumb code on VEX V5) - #159225 (Split IncrCompSession out of Session) - #159820 (Make the `rustc_unsafe_specialization_marker` attribute actually `unsafe`) - #160198 (Rework `smallest_range_containing` to handle duplicates) - #160362 (Split `SpannedTypeVisitor` into its own crate, `rustc_ty_walk`) - #160390 (autodiff: Handle slice-tailed DSTs in type trees) - #160420 (Suggest `cast_signed()` for overflowing signed integer literals) - #160501 (Add bootstrap CLI snapshot test for testing miri) - #160516 (Add regression test for HRTB projection in closure) - #160520 (Add some tests for specialization) - #160522 (fix(bootstrap): Normalize the names of proc macro dependency crates) - #160523 (Add regression test for opaque type) - #160531 (docs: fix typo in AllowExprMetavar comment) - #160538 (Update expect messages in tcp.rs doc examples to follow the style guide) - #160548 (bootstrap: Register `coverage-map` and `coverage-run` aliases via a separate step)

Rollup merge of #155424 - jyn514:llm-policy, r=Mark-Simulacrum [blocked] Link to proposed LLM policy in CONTRIBUTING and pull request template **Blocked** until rust-lang/rust-forge#1040 merges. As described in rust-lang/blog.rust-lang.org#1897, this adds a checkbox for authors to confirm that they have/have not used an LLM. For that reason I would like to merge it *before* the blog post.

rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Apr 17, 2026

jieyouxu added the S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. label Apr 17, 2026

jyn514 force-pushed the llm-policy branch from 2550372 to b1480b7 Compare June 18, 2026 08:36

rustbot added the T-rustfmt Relevant to the rustfmt team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jul 28, 2026

jyn514 force-pushed the llm-policy branch from 5e1e02e to 51a3570 Compare July 28, 2026 19:46

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

jyn514 marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2026 07:12

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 30, 2026

rustbot assigned Mark-Simulacrum Jul 30, 2026

rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Jul 30, 2026

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view

rustbot removed the T-rustfmt Relevant to the rustfmt team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jul 30, 2026

jyn514 closed this Jul 30, 2026

jyn514 deleted the llm-policy branch July 30, 2026 07:16

rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 30, 2026

jyn514 restored the llm-policy branch July 30, 2026 07:16

jyn514 reopened this Jul 30, 2026

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 30, 2026

jyn514 force-pushed the llm-policy branch from 4c0e15e to 51adf38 Compare July 30, 2026 07:19

Mark-Simulacrum approved these changes Aug 1, 2026

View reviewed changes

jyn514 force-pushed the llm-policy branch from 51adf38 to 76aa663 Compare August 1, 2026 14:16

Mark-Simulacrum reviewed Aug 1, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread .github/pull_request_template.md Outdated

jyn514 force-pushed the llm-policy branch from 76aa663 to 0b75b63 Compare August 1, 2026 14:22

rustbot added the T-rustfmt Relevant to the rustfmt team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Aug 1, 2026

rustbot removed the S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. label Aug 5, 2026

rust-bors Bot added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Aug 5, 2026

rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 5, 2026

rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Aug 5, 2026

JonathanBrouwer mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2026

Rollup of 11 pull requests #160547

Closed

jhpratt mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2026

Rollup of 16 pull requests #160549

Closed

JonathanBrouwer mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2026

Rollup of 22 pull requests #160554

Closed

JonathanBrouwer mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2026

Rollup of 25 pull requests #160557

Closed

JonathanBrouwer mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2026

Rollup of 25 pull requests #160559

Merged

rust-bors Bot merged commit e4b7f41 into rust-lang:main Aug 5, 2026
13 checks passed

rustbot added this to the 1.99.0 milestone Aug 5, 2026

jyn514 deleted the llm-policy branch August 5, 2026 22:33

jyn514 changed the title ~~[blocked] Link to proposed LLM policy in CONTRIBUTING and pull request template~~ Link to proposed LLM policy in CONTRIBUTING and pull request template Aug 5, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Conversation

jyn514 commented Apr 17, 2026 • edited by rustbot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

rustbot commented Jul 30, 2026

Uh oh!

rustbot commented Jul 30, 2026

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as resolved.

jyn514 commented Jul 30, 2026

Uh oh!

Mark-Simulacrum left a comment • edited by rustbot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Mark-Simulacrum Aug 1, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

jyn514 Aug 1, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

jyn514 Aug 1, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Mark-Simulacrum Aug 1, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

rust-bors Bot commented Aug 1, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

rustbot commented Aug 1, 2026

Uh oh!

jyn514 commented Aug 5, 2026

Uh oh!

jyn514 commented Aug 5, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

rust-bors Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Uh oh!

jyn514 commented Aug 5, 2026

Uh oh!

rust-bors Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Uh oh!

jyn514 commented Aug 5, 2026

Uh oh!

rust-bors Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

jyn514 commented Apr 17, 2026 •

edited by rustbot

Loading

Mark-Simulacrum left a comment •

edited by rustbot

Loading

jyn514 commented Aug 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading