Skip to content

Submit Flow to Scoop and winget, and keep the manifests that went - #10

Merged
samartomar merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
manifests-for-submission
Sep 24, 2026
Merged

samartomar merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
manifests-for-submission

Conversation

@samartomar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Flow's manifests went out on 2026-09-24 (v0.6.1):

This PR keeps the prepared copies here identical to what was sent.

  • Moniker flow-dictation. flow is MadrasCheck.flow's moniker, and winget monikers are unique. The command on PATH is still flow.
  • The winget description is rewritten for v0.6.1. It described the Classic pill: ctrl+alt+space, a draft above the pill, and Edit.
  • Schema 1.12.0. winget-pkgs' template asks for it, and winget validate passes.
  • PUBLISHING.md records the submission and the two naming collisions: Scoop Main's flow is Facebook's type checker, which is also why Extras wasn't asked.
  • The guide gains a "With Scoop" install. winget joins it once Microsoft accepts the package.

The suite has 3204 tests. Locally, the only failures are the 13 known test_refine ones.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The manifests went out on 2026-09-24, as v0.6.1:
- Scoop through Flow's own bucket, samartomar/scoop-flow;
- winget as microsoft/winget-pkgs#440220.
Checking them against what was already in each place changed three things, and the
prepared copies here now match what was sent.

- The winget moniker is flow-dictation. `flow` is MadrasCheck.flow's moniker, and
  monikers are unique in winget. The command on PATH is still `flow`.
- The winget description described the Classic pill: ctrl+alt+space, a draft above the
  pill, Edit. It now describes v0.6.1: hold ctrl+win, paste, a spoken fix, Refine, Ask,
  and Flow Home.
- The winget manifests moved from schema 1.6.0 to 1.12.0, which winget-pkgs' pull request
  template asks for. `winget validate` passes on both the copies here and the ones sent.

Scoop went to Flow's own bucket, not Extras. Scoop's main bucket already has a `flow`
(Facebook's JavaScript type checker), and Extras takes a pull request only after its
maintainers approve a request issue. The bucket was made from Scoop's BucketTemplate. Its
CI passed on the manifest, and its Excavator keeps the manifest current from each
release's .sha256 every four hours.

PUBLISHING.md now records the submission in place of the choice it laid out, and the
guide gains a "With Scoop" install. winget stays out of the guide until Microsoft accepts
the package, so the guide never states a pending status.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-24T03:56:27.826852Z e468438 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@samartomar
samartomar merged commit f9a8776 into main Sep 24, 2026
4 checks passed
@samartomar
samartomar deleted the manifests-for-submission branch September 24, 2026 03:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant