refactor(db): require a transaction for advisory lock helpers - #8364
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. |
Contributor
|
Collaborator
Author
Collaborator
Author
|
@cubic-dev-ai review this PR |
Contributor
@waleedlatif1 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete. |
This branch was previously deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
acquireAdvisoryXactLock/tryAcquireAdvisoryXactLocktookDbOrTx, which also admits the pool-leveldb. A transaction-scoped advisory lock taken on the pool runs in autocommit and releases immediately, so the caller would run unprotected. No call site did this, but nothing stopped itDbTransaction, so that misuse fails at compile time. Also narrowed: the org mutation/membership locks and the MCP transaction lock timeout, the same xact-scoped hazard, andwithTransactionRetry's callback, whose argument is always a transactionrequirePersonalTokenEnrollment(input, lockingTx?)replaces(input, executor, lock); no caller ever passed a tx without locking or locked without a txloadReviewPreview(row, prepared, lockingTx?): preview still reads ondb, resolve still locksFOR UPDATEon its txDbTransactionand readsdb, with the same authorize → prepare → tx → lock → re-authorize → execute → audit orderType of Change
Testing
check:auditspassChecklist