Skip to content

[NONEVM-3009] [Testing] Contracts don't lose balance on fees - #332

Draft
duck-types wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
test/balance-loss-checks
Draft

duck-types wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
test/balance-loss-checks

Conversation

@duck-types

@duck-types duck-types commented Nov 11, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

NONEVM-3009

CCIP Contracts should not have their balance decreased on tx (except some exceptions) by gas or fwd/action fees. The only expense should be rent fees and all other cost should be covered by the message value.

@duck-types
duck-types force-pushed the fix/send-executor-validation branch from 92e7f47 to aaddd51 Compare November 11, 2025 11:13
@duck-types
duck-types force-pushed the test/balance-loss-checks branch from 46e7246 to 7b3249e Compare November 11, 2025 11:13
Base automatically changed from fix/send-executor-validation to main November 11, 2025 13:42
@duck-types duck-types changed the title checking tx net flow [NONEVM-3009] [Testing] Contracts don't lose balance on fees Nov 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant