Issue(s) running the code

[flamingoadmin]

Hey there, this is a really interesting blog post! Thanks for making it.

I'm having some trouble running the code, however; I believe the issues are related to me using different versions (the most recent) of chalk-diagrams + chalk-planar than you did (some specific issues, looking at blog.py, are that "tx" and "to_color" are not defined, there's no chalk.transform.JAX_MODE, etc). I tried installing alternative versions from github commits, but couldn't find the right ones.

If you get a chance to address this (the versions, ...) I would immensely appreciate it.

** I've been looking into diffvg as of late and your post is an excellent resource for understanding it.

[srush]

Hey! Yes sorry for the issue. I'm kind of writing a new version of chalk in parallel with this blog post this summer, and it is currently in mid-flight. I hope to have a working version soon and a V2 of the blog post, but it will take me a week or so.

Yes, I also really like diffvg. This blog was my attempt to understand it.

[flamingoadmin]

Awesome, looking forward to it :)

[ferdos202150762]

Excelent Blog post! Looking forward for V2.

[qimiaohao]

Hey! Yes sorry for the issue. I'm kind of writing a new version of chalk in parallel with this blog post this summer, and it is currently in mid-flight. I hope to have a working version soon and a V2 of the blog post, but it will take me a week or so.

Yes, I also really like diffvg. This blog was my attempt to understand it.

Really good tutorial and resource for learning about the diffvg! Very interesting! Learn a lof from this! But I don't understand why not just use the original chalk package? Why need to be edited for this project? Is that because the original version is not differentiable. If I have ability, I may also can contribute to some of this.

[Bony2002]

Hi! I am writing this a little bit late, but I wanna know if there is a fix for the orginal issue or if you can tell me which version of Chalk does the blog use.