-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 312
feat(types): carry optional entity indices on Relation for span attribution #262
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
sachinynaik
wants to merge
1
commit into
superlinked:main
Choose a base branch
from
sachinynaik:relation-entity-index
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+7
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this. The problem is real and index-by-reference is the right shape: no duplicated span data, and it also links bbox-only image entities that carry no character offsets at all. Happy to take it, but it needs to land as a working slice rather than a type declaration alone. As submitted nothing produces the fields, and every boundary between an adapter and a consumer rebuilds relations from the four existing keys, so the indices cannot reach a caller.
What the PR needs to be complete:
api/extract.pyrebuilds each relation withhead,tail,relationandscoreonly. Carryhead_idxandtail_idxthrough when present. This also keeps the direct path consistent with the queue path, which passes adapter dicts through unchanged.RelationModelintypes/openapi.pyand to theRelationstruct insie_gateway/src/openapi.rs, then regenerate both committed specs withmise run openapi.Relationtypes (sie_sdk/types.py,sie_ts_sdk/src/types.ts) and both parsers (client/_shared.py,internal/parsing.ts) drop the keys today._relation_entity_textalready finds the matching entity by walkingzip(entities, ner_input), and the adapter echoes input entities in order, so the index into the response'sentitieslist is well-defined. GLiNER2 will have to omit the fields because upstream returns text only, which is worth stating in the description.