Repository navigation
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2e69ec370a
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Local verification
just checkpassed on Darwin arm64 using an isolated, pinned Gerbil package workspace. This includes Scheme semantic and integration tests, Lean, C ABI, Python, and wheel build.git diff --checkpassed.Still open in Phase 3
Replacement-obligation derivation, dependency ordering, verifier-choice receipts, and composition obligations remain separate work. This PR does not invoke verifiers or authorize effects.
Core source owner alignment
Source collection and shared authoring-role consumers now import Core directly. CI pins the matching POO Flow integration (
06e3f3f147941d5f020180150211d7c7d7f6401e), which retains Core as a git submodule. The exact Aitia source-collection test passed under the pinned native SDK; no compatibility source or Loader adapter was added.Core configuration entry and UI owner closure
Keep Aitia's product modules and software-engineering Profiles on the shared Core configuration/source APIs after the product UI owner migration.
Consumers import generic selection, source/import and Profile mechanisms from Core and concrete Scenario adapters from their actual product owners. CI pins POO Flow integration
f721d112f1d27569e404d979607007f4a6de6552, with Core tracked as its git submodule. The targeted Aitia source-collection suite passes under the pinned native SDK. No compatibility owner or Loader backend is added; exact-head CI remains required.