Skip to content

Classify constant insertions after stage-1 E_22 and stage-2 E_11 (no κ) - #282

Draft
unpaidmoon wants to merge 1 commit into
cursor/upstream-main-e545235-af37from
cursor/stage1-e22-stage2-e11-gaps-af37
Draft

unpaidmoon wants to merge 1 commit into
cursor/upstream-main-e545235-af37from
cursor/stage1-e22-stage2-e11-gaps-af37

Conversation

@unpaidmoon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

In the nine diagonal gates of the PR CrocSwap#7027 word, constant F_2 matrices in the gap after stage-1 E_22 and the gap after stage-2 E_11 make the coefficient of e equal the pure product for exactly 2^30 pairs. The matched positions are the off-diagonal pairs inside {4, 5} and {1, 2, 3, 6, 7}. Every such coefficient has diagonal entries in {0, P_ii}, and none equals I. No kappa change. Selected κ stays 363005817/100000000000.

Change and mathematical scope

Proof, in F_2[x, y, z][e]/(e^2), of the constant solution set for those two slots. The middle diagonal is diag(1+z, 1, 1, 1, 1+y, 1+y, 1, 1). The count 2^30 agrees with PR CrocSwap#7215, and the solution set does not: (1, 4) is free there and blocked here, while (1, 2) is blocked there and free here. This is not a caller, a native bill, a word for g=13 or g=31, or a selected-frontier change. Polynomial entries and every other slot pair remain open.

Task and overlap

Base: canonical main e54523517d0f03e58352e647c403a5af3e525a57, priority revision 8. Live selected record certificates/selected-result.json is 363005817/100000000000. current-priorities.md on that base still prints 0.00310045; this package does not edit it.

Card: joint-query-controller, scope changed. The card asks whether a changed query demand removes real work. This package takes the first open question of PR CrocSwap#7215, which is the constant classification of the two later gaps in the same nine-gate word.

Ordered eligible list for session r270, after excluding structured CrocSwap#1166 handoffs whose next tasks are already delivered and excluding open-next bullets that a later unpaidmoon PR answers or refines:

  1. PR Prove the weight-1 no-edge image bound is 6 at pattern dimension 4. CrocSwap/integer-mult-bounds#7138: a heavy-covector no-edge pool of pattern dimension 4 acting irreducibly in dimension 6 or more.
  2. PR Record a length-7 support witness for three old signed frames. CrocSwap/integer-mult-bounds#7214: another support solution of R+S+T+U = 4I-E-F-G with at least four odd-c labels. PR Prove a no-edge pattern-dimension-4 pool has total image at most 6. CrocSwap/integer-mult-bounds#7139's first two bullets are answered by Exhibit an irreducible no-edge image of dimension 7 at pattern dimens… CrocSwap/integer-mult-bounds#7237 and Show two dimension-6 no-edge pools outside the three printed coordina… CrocSwap/integer-mult-bounds#7221, and its third bullet only points back at question 1 of Prove the no-edge irreducible joint-image bound is 3. CrocSwap/integer-mult-bounds#6921.
  3. PR Classify constant insertions after stage-0 E_22 and stage-1 E_11. CrocSwap/integer-mult-bounds#7215, first open question: constant F_2 pairs after stage-1 E_22 and stage-2 E_11. This package.

Nearest records: PR CrocSwap#7215 classifies the previous pair and leaves this one. PR CrocSwap#7103 classifies the adjacent stage-0 pair. PR CrocSwap#7191 classifies polynomial entries in that stage-0 pair. PR CrocSwap#7039 is the one-insertion diagonal obstruction. GitHub search on 2026-11-11 found no PR whose title states these two slots. The degree-at-most-1 question left by CrocSwap#7215 for its own slots is not taken.

Validation

Python 3.12, standard library only, from the repository root:

python3 -B scripts/research_package.py --package research/stage1-e22-stage2-e11-gaps

Both the normal and -O commands print PASS_STAGE1_E22_STAGE2_E11_GAPS, with matched_off_diagonal 22, blocked_off_diagonal 34, solution_pairs 2^30, witness_both_nonzero 3, and coefficient_equals_I 0. The registered metadata check passed. The 2^30 matrices are not enumerated: each of the 64 positions has a four-element bit equation, solved exhaustively, and the equations separate. Controls reject (1, 4), an unequal matched bit, a mixed matched-plus-blocked pair, and (I, I). Predecessor replays, Lean, Docker, and the selected cold replay were not run.

Credit

The paired-star contract is PR CrocSwap#5747 (Ali Romman), with PR CrocSwap#5673, PR CrocSwap#5631, and PR CrocSwap#5617. The nine-gate word is PR CrocSwap#7027. The one-insertion obstruction is PR CrocSwap#7039. The adjacent stage-0 classification is PR CrocSwap#7103. Polynomial entries in that pair are PR CrocSwap#7191. The question taken here is the first open question of PR CrocSwap#7215, head e1656a671fffddcd0b9ad07d500825686ff852ae.

Prepared by unpaidmoon with substantial Cursor Grok assistance. Independent human review and a proof-assistant proof are unclaimed. Apache-2.0.

Open next questions

  1. Do degree-at-most-1 entries in these same two gaps give solutions of C = P beyond the 2^30 constant pairs? At the blocked position (1, 4), R_{1,4} = 1 and S_{1,4} = 1+y solves that one entry. First step: keep a legal constant diagonal and legal matched bits, substitute that pair, and multiply against P. Nothing external blocks it. This is not the polynomial question PR Classify polynomial two-gap insertions with exact dimension 64d+50 (no κ) CrocSwap/integer-mult-bounds#7191 answered for the stage-0 gaps, and not the same question PR Classify constant insertions after stage-0 E_22 and stage-1 E_11. CrocSwap/integer-mult-bounds#7215 left for its own slots.
  2. Which constant pairs make C = P after stage-2 E_22 and after the stage-2 leaf gate? The E_22-then-next-E_11 series stops at stage 2. First step: the diagonal of the single gate between those slots.

Workflow feedback (optional)

CrocSwap#1200

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

Prove which constant F_2 pairs make the e coefficient equal the pure product in those two gaps of the nine-gate diagonal word. The solution set has size 2^30 and is not the stage-0 E_22 / stage-1 E_11 set. No kappa change.

Co-authored-by: unpaidmoon <unpaidmoon@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants