add minimum data types and rank range for operations#910
Conversation
@BruceDai : Remerge with main. My PR adds an extra blank line that pacifies the build error (and yes, that line was already correct, and nothing changed there for months, but bikeshed changed). |
reillyeon
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
General wording looks good. I have not validated the specific operator limits specified.
fdwr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👀 Thanks for the updates Bruce - I'm sure they were tedious :b.
|
Thanks @huningxin and @fdwr for review and identifications. 👍 |
949a42f to
b6b300f
Compare
b6b300f to
3f29bff
Compare
mwyrzykowski
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Conflict with the WG meeting, but ✅
@huningxin Thanks for your kindly reminder! Please review the fixing CL-7848774 . |
|
Thanks @reillyeon @huningxin and @fdwr for reviewing and approving CL-7848774, now it has been landed. |
fdwr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Thank you for enabling this.
|
@huningxin @fdwr Now those remaining issues are all resolved by landing CLs into Chromium. Please take another look, thanks! |
|
I suppose this PR is ready to merge. Any further comments? @reillyeon and @anssiko |
This PR is to fix #896.
@huningxin @fdwr @reillyeon PTAL, thanks!
Preview | Diff