fix: bump go version to 1.27.0 - #2786
Conversation
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.OpenSSF Scorecard
Scanned Files
|
9fb7b4b to
7439fb7
Compare
80ff59c to
9904dba
Compare
9904dba to
9aff266
Compare
7439fb7 to
24fc078
Compare
|
Claude finished @kristina-solovyova's task in 2m 17s —— View job Review: bump go version to 1.27.0
The version bump itself is clean and complete. Two things ride along with it that aren't in the title. What checks outRan the grep the Every hit is The comment's claim about CI holds too: all eight 1. Unexplained
|
| // The nested modules under pkg/ do the same, so they need no change here either; their own | ||
| // go directive must stay <= this one, since a replace'd module is built by this toolchain. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nit — "do the same" dangles: line 9 is about setup-go reading go-version-file, and nested modules don't read anything. The constraint you're actually documenting (they're local replace targets built by this toolchain, so their go directive must not exceed this one) is the useful half.
| // The nested modules under pkg/ do the same, so they need no change here either; their own | |
| // go directive must stay <= this one, since a replace'd module is built by this toolchain. | |
| // The pkg/ submodules are local `replace` targets built by this same toolchain, so they | |
| // need no pin of their own here; their `go` directive must stay <= this one. |
24fc078 to
3173343
Compare
|
Claude finished @kristina-solovyova's task in 1m 13s —— View job Re-review after force-push
Only one thing is new since my previous review: the 1. Second unexplained submodule bump (medium)The PR now carries two submodule pointer moves in a commit titled "bump go version":
Both are local I could not inspect either range: the submodules aren't checked out in this workspace, and I don't have permission to query the sibling repos from here. So this is the one claim I can't verify — please state in the PR description what each bump contains. If they're just the engines raising their own 2.
|
3173343 to
b05ff7e
Compare
|
Claude finished @kristina-solovyova's task in 1m 11s —— View job Re-review after force-push
One thing is new since my last review: The bump itself is right and necessary — golangci-lint embeds the Go parser it was built against, and a v2.9-era binary can't parse 1.27 source. 1. The sync-list comment this PR adds is already wrong (medium)
…in the same commit that changes a GitHub Actions file. The The documented escape hatch doesn't cover it either. The grep at matches none of Worth adding 2. Local
|
9aff266 to
8dd1240
Compare
b05ff7e to
508c2fd
Compare
|
Claude finished @kristina-solovyova's task in 41s —— View job Re-review after force-push — no changes to review
The diff against Still open from that review
CI5 passed, 0 failed, 2 in progress ( Nothing here blocks merge. Item 1 remains the one worth fixing first: it's a two-line edit in the comment block whose whole purpose is making the next bump correct. Branch • |
Graphite Automations"Add anton/matt/sergey/kristina as reviwers on operator PRs" took an action on this PR • (09/02/26)2 reviewers were added to this PR based on Anton Bykov's automation. |
508c2fd to
d4fe3e4
Compare
8dd1240 to
44c0313
Compare

No description provided.