feat: Add unit tests - #753
Open
KCGD wants to merge 11 commits into
Open
Conversation
Author
|
I am incrementally adding unit tests on my own fork, but this PR is ready for discussion whenever. |
Author
|
As of right now I'll commit per-test, so the PR should always be in a mergeable state. If there are any changes you would like me to make please reach out and I'll adapt my branch. Otherwise, I'll continue adding tests - I am mainly focusing on the renderer utils until those are complete. Excited to contribute to this awesome project! :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds:
bun run testorbun jest)src/renderer/utils/bus.ts(intests/renderer/utils/bus.test.ts)Currently, tests are stored in the
/testsdirectory, which mirrors/srcwith corresponding unit test files, using naming convention:<file name>.test.ts.So far I have tested:
and noticed no errors.
I have tried using bun's built-in testing suite, but ran into some issues regarding the features it offers.

If bun's built-in suite is preferred, it is viable but will take some adjustments.