Bump carbon registry version

[YasasRangika]

Purpose

$subject for the fixes added for wso2/api-manager#5047. All other affected component versions have been upgraded via #14229.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 49340a0b-3f92-4ee2-8c1a-5a8ffe0cb311

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9c24f85 and 8d4c9aa.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• all-in-one-apim/pom.xml
• api-control-plane/pom.xml
• gateway/pom.xml
• traffic-manager/pom.xml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 3 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the Carbon Registry Maven version from 4.9.13 to 4.9.15 in the all-in-one APIM, API control plane, gateway, and traffic manager modules.

Changes

Carbon Registry upgrade

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update Carbon Registry version properties all-in-one-apim/pom.xml, api-control-plane/pom.xml, gateway/pom.xml, traffic-manager/pom.xml	The carbon.registry.version property changes from 4.9.13 to 4.9.15 in all four Maven POMs.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 8d4c9

This localized dependency-version update introduces no actionable merge-blocking risk at the current head; it is merge-ready after normal checks and review.

Possibly related PRs

• wso2/product-apim#14278: Updates a different Carbon component version property in the same four Maven POMs.

Suggested reviewers: chamilaadhi, anugayan, arshardh, tharindu1st

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly describes the main change: updating the Carbon Registry version.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description explains that the version update includes fixes for issue #5047 and relates directly to the changeset.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 63.65%. Comparing base (63dbdc3) to head (8d4c9aa).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master   #14294   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     63.65%   63.65%           
  Complexity      165      165           
=========================================
  Files            25       25           
  Lines           454      454           
  Branches         11       11           
=========================================
  Hits            289      289           
  Misses          159      159           
  Partials          6        6           

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration-v2_tests	63.65% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.