Skip to content

Correct MariaDB fallback JDBC URL - #105

Merged
BenCodez merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
codex/mariadb-driver-fallback-url
Oct 3, 2026
Merged

BenCodez merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
codex/mariadb-driver-fallback-url

Conversation

@BenCodez

@BenCodez BenCodez commented Oct 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

MariaDB fallback selects MySQL Connector/J when the native driver is unavailable, but previously kept a jdbc:mariadb: URL. This change uses jdbc:mysql: for the resolved MySQL driver while retaining the configured database type, custom/native drivers, and fallback opt-out.

MariaDB UseSSL=true now requires encryption with both sslMode=REQUIRED and legacy requireSSL=true. Verified modes force certificate validation on both drivers; hostname verification fails closed when unsupported by legacy Connector/J. Weak, duplicate, malformed, or TLS-disabling overrides fail closed. CI tests the real loopback handshake with Connector/J 9.5.0 and 8.0.12, rejecting a non-TLS peer before sending authentication.

Validation at 43c2f32 (includes merged pool fix #106):

  • Modern focused SQL/fallback tests: 31 passed; legacy TLS tests: 9 passed.
  • Clean SimpleAPI install: 457 tests, 456 passed, one unrelated optional MQTT test skipped; full/shared artifact checks passed.
  • Fresh independent review: No findings. Whitespace check passed.
  • AdvancedCore candidate: 1,014 tests plus one artifact check passed.
  • VotingPlugin current master rebuilt against the candidates: 1,813 tests plus five artifact checks passed. Shaded checked-acquisition bytecode verified.

MCHT report 20261003T035844327103Z-58e3ecff88b5 F2 is a separate AdvancedCore nullable-acquisition defect, addressed in a companion change. The three real-database pool-pressure reruns remain pending component-runner access; no MCHT full suite was started. Library publication and rebuilding deployed shaded consumers are still required after merge.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: e98e5f61-8a8e-4e23-8ecc-3e79416bf90e
  • Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-03T18:11:41.890128Z 43c2f32 Manual request
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-02T23:34:38.754599Z 99b702b PR opened

Security findings

Advisory findings (1)

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggered

Here are some automated security review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 99b702b134

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@BenCodez

BenCodez commented Oct 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Breezy!

Reviewed commit: 99b702b134

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 96d540adc5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e7cb932b8b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@BenCodez

BenCodez commented Oct 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff.

Reviewed commit: 43c2f32654

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@BenCodez
BenCodez merged commit d491453 into main Oct 3, 2026
5 checks passed
@BenCodez
BenCodez deleted the codex/mariadb-driver-fallback-url branch October 3, 2026 20:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant