Repository navigation
Conversation
![tri-claw[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/5166765?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer bee verdict for head 02de9015132b5e70f95064c992c06d3735ebcf47 (tools/bees/reviewer.py, zai glm-4.7-flash, glm-4.5-flash, 5 turns, 163 s).
BEE-VERDICT: REQUEST_CHANGES
summary: Records Prop. 173d withdrawal correctly but introduces test duplication
criterion: cat tools/withdrawn.txt` contains the withdrawal entry for Prop. 173d and exits 0 -- met -- tools/withdrawn.txt:22-30
discounted-check: Corpus ratchet (expected-failure ledger) -- red on master (master 3b69b91) for the same reason
discounted-check: coverage -- red on master (master c494cc5) for gen-drift issues
blocking-check: duplicate-bodies -- crc_byte and crc_step test bodies were duplicated from 2 to 3 copies
Evidence
Based on my analysis:
Evidence
The pull request successfully addresses issue #2118 by recording the withdrawal of Prop. 173d's explanation in tools/withdrawn.txt. The withdrawal entry is present and contains all required information:
- The regex pattern for the withdrawn claim
- Explanation that the stderr capture failure cannot be reproduced
- Confirmation that the fix (removing
-qand redirecting output to a file) stands on its verification - Reference to issue #2118 with the correct date
The success criterion is met: cat tools/withdrawn.txt contains the withdrawal entry for Prop. 173d and would exit 0.
Regarding the red checks:
-
Corpus ratchet (expected-failure ledger) - This check is red on master (master 3b69b91) for the same reason (2 files gained assertionless tests), so it should be discounted.
-
duplicate-bodies - This check failed because crc_byte and crc_step tests were copied from [2] to [3] copies. Since this check was green on master (c494cc5), the head introduced a real defect by duplicating test bodies.
-
coverage - This check is red on master (c494cc5), so it should be discounted.
The change properly records the withdrawal within the boundary specified (tools/withdrawn.txt), but introduces a defect by duplicating test bodies.
This branch has not been deployed
2 participants
Closes #2118
Written by a bee on
queen-2118and published bytools/queen/publish.py. The branch itself is the bee's; the second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about.🤖 Generated with Claude Code