[MageByte-Zero]

Summary

 spec-superflow: direct/planned workflow + bundled same-version CLI
+ Windows-compatible Qoder/WorkBuddy installers
+ CatPaw (妙手) import-package preview

Sync the existing catalog entry with spec-superflow v2.1.0. Only the existing README entry changes; generated bundles and catalog files are left to the maintainer-verified generator.

The source v2.1.0 manifests are merged into main and the maintainer has published the v2.1.0 tag, GitHub Release and npm package (latest: 2.1.0). Per the maintainer's explicit decision, marketplace synchronization is tracked independently from GitHub/npm publication. Marketplace lag is reported by the source workflow without blocking publication.

Evidence

• Before: the generated marketplace manifest reports 2.0.1.
  After (source): merged source MageByte-Zero/spec-superflow@fb5d4d535ed2abcf83615dee9e324b447fbd5875 reports 2.1.0. Source release preparation: chore: release v2.1.0 MageByte-Zero/spec-superflow#140; publication policy: ci: decouple release publication from marketplace sync MageByte-Zero/spec-superflow#141. GitHub Release: https://github.com/MageByte-Zero/spec-superflow/releases/tag/v2.1.0.
• Exact merged-source Plugin Scanner: 99 / A, scanner 2.0.992, policy_pass: true, verify_pass: true.
• Findings: critical 0, high 0, medium 0, low 0, info 13.
• Scanner run: https://github.com/MageByte-Zero/spec-superflow/actions/runs/40263103634 (JSON report artifact retained).
• Source PR passed Ubuntu/Windows × Node 20/22, nine-platform install smoke, Windows shims and Scanner. Local candidate: build + 950/950 tests, example validations, version consistency, doctor, raw-package smoke and actual-tarball WorkBuddy/Qoder/CodeBuddy installation checks.
• CatPaw is explicitly a package preview: local structure/relocation/runtime checks pass; desktop import, cloud and model-task acceptance remain pending.

Existing-entry updates may skip the catalog scan; the exact merged-source numeric scan above is supplied for review. The catalog-owned scan remains authoritative.

Merge Danger

Door: two-way.

Blast Radius: Catalog

One README line changes. No generated marketplace files or unrelated fork history are included. After the generator finishes, marketplace manifest 2.1.0 and a clean Codex installation remain separate delivery checks. The source tag and GitHub Release are already published.

[qodo-free-for-open-source-projects]

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review

Tip of the day

💡 Did you know, you can type 'qodo, fix this' on a finding and the fix lands right on your PR

More tips ↗ | Customize Qodo ↗ | Qodo docs ↗

[qodo-free-for-open-source-projects]

PR Summary by Qodo

Document spec-superflow v2.1.0 capabilities in the catalog

📝 Documentation 🕐 Less than 5 minutes

AI Description

• Refresh the existing spec-superflow listing to describe Windows-compatible Qoder and WorkBuddy
 installers.
• Identify CatPaw support as an import-package preview; leave generated catalog files to the
 maintainer-verified generator.

Diagram

graph TD
  S["spec-superflow source"] --> R["README listing"] --> G["Catalog generator"] --> C["Generated catalog"]

Loading

High-Level Assessment

Keep the README-only change. The repository's contribution process assigns generated bundles and catalog files to a maintainer-verified generator, so editing those artifacts in this PR would bypass that process.

Files changed (1) +1 / -1

Documentation (1) +1 / -1

README.mdRefresh the spec-superflow catalog description +1/-1

Refresh the spec-superflow catalog description

• The existing entry now mentions Windows-compatible Qoder and WorkBuddy installers and labels CatPaw support as an import-package preview. It also removes the default-review qualifier; the link and other capability descriptions remain in place.

README.md

[zerocodefast]

The required catalog, alphabetical, and artifact checks pass, but the catalog sweep skips this existing-entry update and does not establish the centralized score required by merge policy. The source-side 99/100 result is useful evidence but does not replace the catalog-owned scan, so I’m leaving this open until that score is available.