Skip to content

[authentication/1] Size implementation and define milestone delivery #39

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
omry wants to merge 1 commit into from
Open

[authentication/1] Size implementation and define milestone delivery #39

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 7 additions & 7 deletions docs/authentication/.review/implementation-plan.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,19 +3,19 @@ artifact: swe-design-review-attestation
schema_version: 5
scope_key: c2ebaf06c49668e199e08bccef68303c5cd0925e79b8f635860bb8fa8494d61b
scope: {"kind": "path", "primary_target": "docs/authentication/implementation-plan.md", "repository": ".", "selector": "docs/authentication/implementation-plan.md"}
review_content_identity_sha256: 81a890d11ab505cc9c5b7fae80c652da869ce224b7b80ace73bb73dd430a767b
target_content_identity_sha256: 6521d7d1f0a3315b5973ba93866ca2929e625f9df7535ad1393154102c548224
review_content_identity_sha256: bc445c81f584d3d0a83d7826fb052aa4e943d26a4d627fd7d7a32b2bb0b8e711
target_content_identity_sha256: a9d3c2a74376b48f8af8fc97c2e7c18069b97e5e9b209ce3658fcff8bf8083b1
baseline_content_identity_sha256: ad1ec634421f4d4b16b5cb61c07844e945fa11d0737e7e59757b3b3aabbf21ce
target_documents: [{"executable": false, "path": "docs/authentication/implementation-plan.md", "repository": ".", "sha256": "2bf706ba336f4560a5a40409e0928cc9cd9cb91bc00934045bd79313f66c95de"}]
target_documents: [{"executable": false, "path": "docs/authentication/implementation-plan.md", "repository": ".", "sha256": "c576091af919c3ec99f0e0edb5795cf4e7bd37a44415ae24742393822317ad3d"}]
baseline_documents: [{"executable": false, "path": "docs/authentication/high-level-design.md", "repository": ".", "sha256": "b6511414b3a9b485542df83c8f7abfc499dc8d06e522819b48e162a562d21c57"}, {"executable": false, "path": "docs/authentication/requirements.md", "repository": ".", "sha256": "d56e92a7cb01f131ba499650c4a5d7b2c8d17adf2cdc7d612eee7c5f53d07929"}]
design_dependency_documents: [{"executable": false, "path": "docs/authentication/high-level-design.md", "repository": ".", "sha256": "b6511414b3a9b485542df83c8f7abfc499dc8d06e522819b48e162a562d21c57"}, {"executable": false, "path": "docs/authentication/requirements.md", "repository": ".", "sha256": "d56e92a7cb01f131ba499650c4a5d7b2c8d17adf2cdc7d612eee7c5f53d07929"}]
plan_binding: {"base_revision": "94994fafe8c568f608387fbecf2a32bd37fbc645", "documents": [{"executable": false, "path": "docs/authentication/implementation-plan.md", "plan_key": "arbiter-authentication", "sha256": "2bf706ba336f4560a5a40409e0928cc9cd9cb91bc00934045bd79313f66c95de", "slice_convention": "hierarchical-v1"}], "predecessors": []}
plan_binding: {"base_revision": "0aa1b60a3c13a713e4e27c0645b0763c3d2fc6a1", "documents": [{"executable": false, "path": "docs/authentication/implementation-plan.md", "plan_key": "arbiter-authentication", "sha256": "c576091af919c3ec99f0e0edb5795cf4e7bd37a44415ae24742393822317ad3d", "slice_convention": "hierarchical-v1"}], "predecessors": []}
document_repository: "."
document_path: "docs/authentication/implementation-plan.md"
document_revision_provenance: "94994fafe8c568f608387fbecf2a32bd37fbc645"
document_sha256: 2bf706ba336f4560a5a40409e0928cc9cd9cb91bc00934045bd79313f66c95de
document_revision_provenance: "0aa1b60a3c13a713e4e27c0645b0763c3d2fc6a1"
document_sha256: c576091af919c3ec99f0e0edb5795cf4e7bd37a44415ae24742393822317ad3d
verdict: clean
attested_at: 2026-10-19T20:29:54Z
attested_at: 2026-10-20T06:27:44Z
---
<!-- swe-design-review-attestation:v5 -->

Expand Down
29 changes: 17 additions & 12 deletions docs/authentication/README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,20 +2,20 @@

Start with the [requirements baseline](requirements.md), then the
[high-level design](high-level-design.md), followed by the
[implementation plan](implementation-plan.md). All three passed actual DBB and
[implementation plan](implementation-plan.md). All three passed DBB and
their respective SWE reviews. Their [requirements stamp](.review/requirements.md),
[HLD stamp](.review/high-level-design.md) and
[plan stamp](.review/implementation-plan.md) bind exact bytes and the appropriate
requirements/HLD dependencies. The delivery sequence is requirements,
high-level design, then an implementation plan with slices. Each stage
is reviewed and stamped at its own level, with actual DBB review of the final
is reviewed and stamped at its own level, with DBB review of the final
document bytes before stamping.

The [earlier synthesis](design.md) and [candidate security contracts](security-contracts.md)
retain the mechanisms already assessed by DBB as historical inputs to the HLD.
They are not a completed high-level design or additional binding requirements.

The interview is closed. Actual DBB resolved findings 1–5 at design level;
The interview is closed. DBB resolved findings 1–5 at design level;
finding 6 uses the owner's accepted restore/migration procedure for cooperative
servers. Protocol, implementation and release readiness are not established.
The B1–B5 groups supplied the HLD agenda; their implementation evidence remains
Expand All @@ -31,8 +31,9 @@ by these documents.
The [requirements DBB report](reviews/requirements-dbb.md) gives the current
requirements-level verdict; the [HLD DBB report](reviews/hld-dbb.md) gives the
exact-byte HLD pass. Earlier reports concern candidate architecture.
The [plan DBB report](reviews/plan-dbb.md) records two plan gaps, their repair
and the exact-byte round-two pass.
The [initial plan review](reviews/plan-dbb.md) records the safe artifact-prefix
and certificate-renewal repairs. The [plan sizing review](reviews/plan-sizing-dbb.md)
covers the current child-PR estimates and repaired activation/denial order.
- [Original draft and interview](../archive/authentication-and-enrollment/README.md):
immutable historical evidence, not required reading or instructions to resume
questioning.
Expand All @@ -41,10 +42,14 @@ The HLD covers B1–B5 and shared boundaries. Fourteen local Python/Go feasibili
checks passed; platform, production dependency, race and crash validation remain
implementation obligations. No product authentication is implemented by this work.

The plan defines eleven PRs under stable identity `arbiter-authentication`, with
per-slice acceptance, integration and review gates. Actual DBB required explicit
safe artifact-prefix tests and certificate-renewal ownership; both are now in
the stamped plan. These are plan corrections, not implemented security fixes.

Next, with separate authorization: slice 1, operator authority setup and local
control. No implementation slice or PR has started.
The plan retains eleven milestones under stable identity `arbiter-authentication`,
split into sixty planned PRs with separate production/test estimates and confidence.
Target about 600 changed handwritten code lines per PR; the hard maximum is 1,000,
including tests. Estimates remain uncertain and can require further splits.
DBB required receipt recovery before activation and complete live denial before
ordinary API cutover; the reviewed order now enforces both. Earlier artifact-prefix
and renewal obligations remain. These are plan corrections, not implemented fixes.

Next, with separate authorization: child PR 1.1, private authority initialization,
within milestone 1 (operator authority setup and authenticated local control).
No implementation slice or PR has started.
Loading
Loading