Repository navigation
spec(igla): own_model -- the seven DELIVER cells reviewed, 3 published / 22 verified (Closes #10269) - #10270
Merged
Conversation
…the review (Closes #10269) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
gHashTag
enabled auto-merge (squash)
October 18, 2026 06:32
Contributor
PR DashboardGenerated at: 2026-10-18 06:32:16 UTC
Summary
Seal Status
|
This was referenced Oct 18, 2026
This was referenced Oct 18, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #10269. Epic #10024.
What changes
REVIEWEDtrue at cells 7, 8, 16, 17, 18, 25 and 27 (indices 6, 7, 15, 16, 17, 24, 26), the seven grounded DELIVER cells.Why this PR carries its own review
#10185 grounded these cells and was meant to hold their review with auto-merge off. Auto-merge was re-enabled and took it in on 2026-10-18 06:24. The only review on it was the reviewer bee's REQUEST_CHANGES on an older head (review 5561355779). So this PR puts the same evidence to review again:
REVIEW_PRnames this PR.REVIEW_IDis filled in with the reviewer bee's APPROVE once it exists. Until then it readsREVIEW_ID_TBD, and this PR must not merge.Evidence per cell is in the header of
specs/igla/own_model.t27(the "measured", "live" and "review" lines), the same text #10185 merged.Verified on the Railway lab
On checkout fdb6b28 with these two files:
t27c test-report specs/igla/own_model.t27: 10 pass, 0 fail, 0 vacuous.t27c test-report specs/igla/own_model_board.t27: 6 pass, 0 fail, 0 vacuous.REVIEWED[24]set back to false: 2 fail (a_status_is_earned_not_chosen,a_review_is_named_not_assumed).🤖 Generated with Claude Code