Repository navigation
Conversation
#510 (opened 2026-08-08, merged 2026-10-04) added the GF-T paper documents from before the GF-T -> TEF -> TNF renames. Main has failed two gates since 57de4a1, and every branch cut from it fails gates-can-fail because those two gates are untestable on a red tree. doc-refs, 7 new dangling references, 9 unpublished exclusions, 2 stale baseline entries: - 3 references in the inventory named files in our other repositories by bare name, and 2 of the bare names matched an unrelated file in a sibling (PLAN.md in tri-net, main.tex in t27). Qualified with the repository the inventory row already names: gHashTag/goldenfloat-preprint (private), gHashTag/arith2027-goldenfloat, gHashTag/paper3-methodology. - 7 cross-repo exclusions are genuine (tri-net fpga/gft/*.v, t27 docs/arxiv-submission/trinity-gf16.tex) and are now published, written by --update-lists against materialised siblings. - 6 references name the GF-T oracles and a build directory that no tree has. The documents are records of the August state; they go in the baseline, as the same names from sibling documents already do, and RENAME_MAP says what they became. - 2 baseline entries no longer reproduce because #510 added the files they named; removed. orphan-artefacts: the two competition artefacts in research/arxiv_gft/ have no generator in any gHashTag repository that code search can see. Listed in the baseline rather than covered by a generator that was not the one used. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
X Brain Health CheckScore: 100.0/100 X Brain is above merge threshold |
🧪 Brain Stress Test ResultsScore: not measured (no stress test prints a Score: line) X Stress test passed |
961be30 to
7cf4429
Compare
Summary by t27-beesThis PR fixes two failing CI gates (document references and orphaned artefacts) caused by #510, which added historical GF-T documents that reference renamed/moved files and untracked build paths. The fix qualifies bare cross-repo names in the inventory, adds the now-missing GF-T oracle files and a build directory to the doc-refs baseline, declares genuine cross-repo targets in tri-net and t27 as exclusions, and lists two competition artefacts in the orphan baseline because no generator exists in any default branch. Worth a look
Read: 6 files, +33 -6, the whole diff. Head |
…agents.json after gHashTag/t27#8054 (#909) Carries #872's commit 7cf4429 unchanged (the #510 debt), plus agents.json in AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md as a format name rather than a path, after gHashTag/t27#8054 deleted the unrelated t27 seal it matched by basename. No checker code and no baseline entry for agents.json change. Closes #908 Co-authored-by: Dmitrii Vasilev <admin@t27.ai>
|
Your commit 7cf4429 landed on Dmitrii Fedorov (@dmitrii-f-t27) |
What
Since #510 merged (57de4a1, 2026-10-04 18:42Z), main fails Document references (run 37225448197) and Orphaned artefacts (37225448159). Every PR whose merge commit includes #510 fails those two checks as well. #867 and #870 are examples: their own changes touch neither checker. A PR that also changes a workflow fails gates-can-fail too, because that gate reports both checkers as UNTESTABLE on a red tree. #870 is that case.
#510 was opened on 2026-08-08, before the GF-T → TEF → TNF renames. It added
research/ARXIV_GFT16_v2.md,research/arxiv_gft/and two dated notes, all of which name files by their August names.This PR changes gate data and one inventory document. It changes no checker code.
gHashTag/<repo>/<path>, using the repo named in the same inventory row. Two of them,PLAN.mdandmain.tex, had matched unrelated files in tri-net and t27 by name alonetools/doc_refs_crossrepo.txtfpga/gft/gft_mul.v,gft_mul32.v,gft_add64.v; t27docs/arxiv-submission/trinity-gf16.tex). The other 2 are the false matches abovegft16_ref.py,gft_ref.py) and an untracked build directory. Added totools/doc_refs_baseline.txt, where the same names from sibling documents of the same week already are.research/RENAME_MAP.mdnow says what they becameARXIV_GFT16_v2.mdandgft_paper.tex, the files they namedresearch/arxiv_gft/. GitHub code search across gHashTag finds no generator for either; it covers default branches only. Listed intools/orphan_artefacts_baseline.txtThe lists and the doc-refs baseline were written by the checker's own
--update-listsand--update-baseline. The diffs are exactly the rows above and nothing else.Measured
All local runs used the checkers from main on a full export of 57de4a1. Siblings were laid out as
tools/materialise_siblings.shlays them out: an empty file per path at each sibling's HEAD, with privatetrios-meshskipped because CI cannot clone it.doc-refs counts are new dangling references / unpublished exclusions / stale baseline entries.
`tools/x7_negative_control_absent.py`research/x7_negative_control.jsonNot changed
research/arxiv_gft/README.mdnames an oracle that this tree no longer has. Its numbers cannot be re-derived here, and this PR says so in RENAME_MAP rather than pointing the row at a renamed oracle that was never run against them.research/block/kurtosis_all.jsonis still in the orphan baseline, but it is no longer an orphan, because two Markdown files now name it. Unlike doc-refs, the orphan gate does not fail on a stale baseline entry, and it counts any.mdthat names a file as that file's producer. Both are checker questions and belong in their own PR.tools/doc_refs_split.mdis a snapshot that no gate reads, and it is not regenerated here.Not measured
fpga/gft/gft_mul.vis byte-identical to the August build copy thatARXIV_GFT16_v2.mdnames.Refs #851, #870
🤖 Generated with Claude Code