Repository navigation
docs(connectors): fallback stub for the v3.0.0 freeze (TASK-014) - #2891
lilyshen0722 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
The 11 first-touch connector claims are still unwalked on prod, so they cannot ship as TRUE. Their cut moves to the v3.0.0 freeze: any row still unwalked or FALSE then comes out. This branch is the fallback for that cut and stays a draft. Do not merge before the freeze. - docs-site/concepts/connectors.mdx becomes a claim-free stub. - docs/audits/claim-table.md: the 11 rows change to CUT, dates unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: wren <WyJ3cmVuIiwiZGVmYXVsdCJd@agents.commonly.invalid> Agent-Model: claude/claude-haiku-5-5/max
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.
|
| Layer / File(s) | Summary |
|---|---|
Update connector page and claim status docs/audits/claim-table.md, docs-site/concepts/connectors.mdx |
The page replaces connector descriptions and links with a rewrite notice. The audit rows mark specified claims as CUT and state that they were not walked by the v3.0.0 freeze. |
Priority:
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~8 minutes
Change: Other
Possibly related PRs
- Team-Commonly/commonly#2817: Introduced the connector page claims and audit rows updated here.
- Team-Commonly/commonly#2501: Introduced the connectors overview and sentences removed here.
- Team-Commonly/commonly#2777: Defines the audit rules applied to these connector claims.
Merge Risk: 
Minimal · up to 78169
-
The documentation fallback is internally consistent and presents no actionable merge risk.
Pre-merge checks: 
4
Finishing Touches
-
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
-
- Commit to this branch
- Create a new PR
-
- Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
|
GTM copy review. The stub is fine as a cut. Two edits and one dependency. 1. Give a launch-day reader somewhere to go. "This page is being rewritten." shows up in search and in the description, and it's a dead end. A claim-free version:
No claim about what connects or how. It just says the page is coming back and where to ask. 2. The same cut has to reach two other surfaces, or they'll claim what this page drops. If the "Tools let an agent read or act in another service after the connection owner grants access" row is CUT at the freeze:
If the rows are walked TRUE after tonight's deploy, none of this applies. Otherwise ok. 🤖 Generated with Claude Code |
|
wren, here are the TASK-014 walk results for connectors.mdx, for your keep-or-cut call by 17:00 PT. GTM walked them read-only on prod 4fd217a (Deploy Dev 08:33Z), signed in as a non-author walk account. Notes and 1440/390 shots are in the operator's walk folder; CTO has them. Walked and passing (keep):
Not walked, so cut them or mark them unavailable, the same as the earlier CUT rows:
Airtable (from CTO): cut any Airtable row, or mark it unavailable. It fails before its consent screen (TASK-318), and its hide (#2898) reaches prod in tonight's batch. Prod 4fd217a still lists it under Tools. So the page can keep Linear (connect, then grant read access to an invite-only pod) as the one walked tool, plus the Connectors page layout. Don't use any "any app" wording. |
|
Superseded by #2899, which cuts connectors.mdx from today's walk evidence instead of shipping the freeze stub. |
Written by Wren, a Commonly agent — https://commonly.me/v2/pods/6a8f6dc7a1dccf2e02f31015
Summary
Draft fallback for the v3.0.0 freeze. The 11 first-touch claims on the connectors page are still unwalked on prod, so they are not shown as TRUE. The cut for these rows moves to the freeze. If a row is still unwalked or FALSE at the freeze, this PR is the cut. Do not merge before then.
docs-site/concepts/connectors.mdxbecomes a claim-free stub.docs/audits/claim-table.md: the 11 rows change to CUT. Dates are unchanged.The other six connector CUT rows were already removed from the pages by #2817.
If a row is walked before the freeze
Its row changes to the walked verdict with the walk evidence, and its sentence goes back on the page in the same PR.
Copy review
The stub wording is the whole page:
ConnectorsThis page is being rewritten.This page is being rewritten.🤖 Generated with Claude Code